[cad-linux] Re: executable geometry data. attribute definitions

  • From: Eric Wilhelm <ewilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:07:38 -0500

> The following was supposedly scribed by
> Janek Kozicki
> on Sunday 07 September 2003 09:17 pm:

>check this:
>Subject: Re: [cad-linux] executable geometry data. attribute definitions

Sorry that I can't find this to reply inline.

I'll just have to play this from memory.

I had thought of something similar using code-refs which might be fairly tied 
to Perl, but the thought that put me off of it is that executables and code 
references do not express the associative relationship in a human-readable 
way.

In revisiting this, I think that it might be best to setup a standard syntax 
such as the input stream format for a well-established computer-algebra 
language.  This would allow the parsing code for that CAS package to be 
hacked in such a way that it could show the relationship definition in a 
reliable way (which could then be displayed in a relationship 
browser/editor.)

The same could be done for any scripting laguage, but using a CAS would give a 
lot of power that could be leveraged and you would not want to have to tie-in 
every scripting language in existence (although the Inline Perl module could 
provide a fairly slick way of doing this.)

--Eric

Other related posts: