> The following was supposedly scribed by > Janek Kozicki > on Sunday 07 September 2003 09:17 pm: >check this: >Subject: Re: [cad-linux] executable geometry data. attribute definitions Sorry that I can't find this to reply inline. I'll just have to play this from memory. I had thought of something similar using code-refs which might be fairly tied to Perl, but the thought that put me off of it is that executables and code references do not express the associative relationship in a human-readable way. In revisiting this, I think that it might be best to setup a standard syntax such as the input stream format for a well-established computer-algebra language. This would allow the parsing code for that CAS package to be hacked in such a way that it could show the relationship definition in a reliable way (which could then be displayed in a relationship browser/editor.) The same could be done for any scripting laguage, but using a CAS would give a lot of power that could be leveraged and you would not want to have to tie-in every scripting language in existence (although the Inline Perl module could provide a fairly slick way of doing this.) --Eric