From: Kevin Caldwell To: Carolina birds Mt Rogers, VA: more Least Flycatchers in forested areas and Magnolia Warblers galore Jul 2, 2010 11:04 AM I just returned from two days birding @ Mt Rogers doing a couple of remote routes that do not start @ trailheads (as most do). The routes consisted of 15 points on the AT east of Elk Garden to Wilburn Ridge and then the Scales area to the east. Habitats included high elevation rocky summits, grassy / shrub balds (many being post-logging, still open from years ago and now browsed by wild horses), spruce fir and northern hardwoods. Survey consisted of 30 total points, 15 along each of two routes on 250 meter intervals from 5:45 to approx 10:15 to 10:30am. Vesper's sparrows are throughout open areas with some moderate+ shrub component. Strangely - no hawks of any species observed and not single black-billed cuckoo, which I'd really hoped to find. Perhaps best of all - other than 5 least flycatcher males in 100% gap-less northern hardwoods noted below - were the magnolia warblers found on both routes, perhaps 4 to 5 near Mt Rogers and 7 to 8 males (and 2 females) just north of Scales Gap (where the trailer / caretaker are). These birds sound much like chestnut sided's in quality (in the field that is) but without the rolling dip sounds at the end of the chestnut-side song. It is also shorter. They can also vary their song quite a bit. Magnolias were at four of 7 points in the northern hardwoods with spruce component north of Scales gap. Hermit thrush is quite abundant. Other rare / watch listers for VA were raven, winter wren, rb nuthatch, gc kinglet, and brown creeper. What I will call black-cap chickadees, like in the Smokies, were not crazily abundant - heard at perhaps 4 of 30 stations. I realize the possible mixing with Carolina chicka's however these birds still appear to have all the features (though Mike Tove suggests morphological features don't really stick - the very long tail, fully white side of head) but with only the two-parted or 'half' song, which I never hear from Carolina's...and with all the records up there, I'll stay with BC chickas as likely though of course possibly mixed. The bloodline still seems to be there and memory enough to sing "fee bay" only - and to respond immediately to it. Common throughout for open area include towhee, robin, field / chipping / song sparrows, cedar wax, crows, goldfinch, turkey vulture overhead, and occasional ravens and house wrens at only one point near the Mt. Rogers openings. Typical forest birds are in fact mostly the rare / watch list birds noted above with juncos @ every stop, occasional bt green warbler, and very occasional blue headed vireos. Back to the least FC's - not to break the open areas only concept, but again - I observed five singing least flycatcher males all within 250 lateral meters and there are probably more out of earshot. This is on an east-west section of the AT due south of the southern-most Scales balds and east of Wilson Creek Contrary again to the "open areas" habitat descriptor - these birds are in complete and total northern hardwoods forest though it's maturing 2nd growth. While Harry L, Merrill L, Marilyn W and others have noted this bird as being mostly in higher elevation open areas, and seemingly more so in large river or stream valleys - and I don't dispute that - here again are males & females, clearly breeding in typical northern hardwoods, and approx 1/4 mile or more from the southern edge of the southern-most Scales or Wilson Creek open area to the north and west. There isn't even a canopy gap near these birds as I went offtrail to look. Curiously - I got no least FC's at all at any of the 30 points in about 5 miles of survey along forest / shrub / open area edges on the peaks (which are all gentle & flat) but these are not valley openings, they are very wide, flat ridges & peaks. This is not an NC record for Harry to be concerned about, but with this being my second of two total observations of this bird in the southern Blue Ridge, I'll have to say: dont exclude northern hardwoods as a habitat type for this species. I'm now leaning toward Mr. Patterson's notion that these birds might have such high site fidelity and that perhaps this was originally forested that has been cut into. Perhaps, like the COSEWICK study (Canada) notes that Ceruleans warblers "are apparently unable to identify habitat destruction" and that they appear stay on their territories even if the habitat has been logged out - least FC's may also be staying on but with more success...otherwise, why the full scale forest interior locations? This is only speculation and I've not studied these birds populations or what their forest / edge / opening use is - but there they are, and their use of this forest type is a fact. And - its not in a stream valley or bottomland. Its just interesting. Kevin Caldwell Conservation Biologist Mountains-to-Sea Ecological, Inc. Marshall NC