Yes, we do need a shortcut so BrailloeBlaster can be used from the console. People are using it with the Send option onn the context menu to just translate a file and in other ways.. These are minor adjustments. We're getting there. John On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 07:51:36AM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote: > Yes the brailleblasterw shortcut in the install directory should be > there, it is the shortcut pointing at the correct javaw command and > giving it the correct parameters to start brailleblaster. The w > indicates its the GUI version (IE. uses javaw), I probably should also > create a commandline version which launches using the java command and > so will work from the console. > > I decided to do it with a shortcut inside the installation directory > because then I can have it any other shortcut just points to that, IE. > there is only one shortcut which would need changing should the Java > installation directory change. > > Michael Whapples > On 01/10/2012 01:44, Vic Beckley wrote: > >Michael, > > > >I noticed there is a shortcut in the BB main folder called brailleblasterw. > >What is this for? Is it supposed to be there? > > > >I created a new installer after placing the DLLs back in the > >dist/native/lib > >folder and it worked on all three of my tests. Things look right now. > > > >Thanks for all your hard work on this. It will be a big improvement over > >the > >Inno setup routine. > > > > > >Best regards from Ohio, U.S.A., > > > >Vic > >E-mail: vic.beckley3@xxxxxxxxx > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Whapples > >Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 7:41 PM > >To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: My installer is working > > > >Hello, > >The stuff about launching with NSIS, its that currently the shortcuts > >will show no error messages should the path to Java change, should the > >user remove Java, etc. NSIS could be used to create a executable (just > >another installer which does no installation), could do a JVM check like > >the installer does, and execute the correct command. In fact, such a > >system could even adapt to a situation where the user has a 64-bit > >system, only has a 32-bit JRE to start with but later adds a 64-bit JRE > >and uninstalls the 32-bit JRE. For that to work, of course both sets of > >binaries would need to be installed. > > > >I think my usual idea is the user should find it just works. The above > >issues may be acceptable to some people, they may feel the user should > >have freedom/responsibility. May be I have spent too long with Apple > >stuff. However all that is probably lower priority, the cases where > >shortcuts would be broken are probably fairly rare. > > > >Michael Whapples > >On 01/10/2012 00:22, Vic Beckley wrote: > >>Michael, > >> > >>Personally, I don't see any need for the Launch4j stuff either. > >> > >>I don't quite see the significance of what you mention about the NSIS > >>launcher. I don't really understand exactly what you mean. > >> > >>I will update and give it a try a little later and report back. Thanks. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Best regards from Ohio, U.S.A., > >> > >>Vic > >>E-mail: vic.beckley3@xxxxxxxxx > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Whapples > >>Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 6:48 PM > >>To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: My installer is working > >> > >>The answer to why the SWT.jar file was correct, well I had an exclude > >>clause preventing it being picked up from the dist/lib folder. I forgot > >>about a suitable exclude for the native/lib folder (its to do with how > >>NSIS searches for files when using the recursive option), I have now > >>added a suitable exclude (well improved actually what its searching for). > >> > >>I will look at removing the innosetup stuff. > >> > >>Also, as this installer is creating suitable shortcuts, shall I look at > >>removing the launch4j stuff? I still sort of feel a launcher may be a > >>good idea but launch4j did not work for the 64-bit windows with 32-bit > >>jre so its actually less functional than what the installer now does. > >> > >>Interestingly, NSIS can be used as an launcher, it need not show any > >>installer pages, need not create uninstallers, etc, it can just build an > >>executable which will do some operation like execute a command, > >>depending on what it finds this command could be modified. > >> > >>Michael Whapples > >>On 30/09/2012 21:09, Vic Beckley wrote: > >>>Michael, > >>> > >>>After I deleted the liblouis.dll and liblouisutdml.dll files in the > >>>BrailleBlaster\native\lib folder and created an installer, everything is > >>>working fine on all three of my tests. Did you delete these and forget to > >>>mention it? Why don't I have to delete the SWT.jar file in the > >>>BrailleBlaster\lib folder as well? I'm a little confused, but regardless, > >>>everything is working now for me. The installer really does look very > >>good. > >>>I think all the Inno stuff probably should be removed from the > >repository. > >>I > >>>don't ever see going back to it. > >>> > >>> > >>>Best regards from Ohio, U.S.A., > >>> > >>>Vic > >>>E-mail: vic.beckley3@xxxxxxxxx > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities