[brailleblaster] Re: More on Embosser Drivers

  • From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:41:06 -0400

They can of course give us the binary information, but anything is reverse 
engineerable given enough time.

Take care,
Sina
 

-----Original Message-----
From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 7:26 AM
To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [brailleblaster] More on Embosser Drivers 

I think the driver interface and the classes which implement it should be in a 
package called org.brailleblaster.drivers The
interface would be called driver.java Each class implementing it would be named 
for the embosser which it suppoorts, for example,
Tiger.java Indexd.java Everest.java 

As I mentioned previously, the drivers should be written in Java or converted 
from other languages to avoid messing around with
bindings. A manufacturer might chose to protect propritary information by 
supplying a driver compiled into a C or C++ library. In
this case it woulod be desirable for the manufacturer to also supply the Java 
bindings and to incorporate the JNI portion of the
bindings into the library containing the driver.

Is it possible to put Java code containing proprietary information into a jar 
file which can be used by the Java compiler and the
JRE but which the user cannot see inside? That would make it much easier to get 
Java drivers from manufacurers.

John

--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities



Other related posts: