[brailleblaster] Re: Here's the draft design.
- From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:05:40 -0500
Correct. Ant has javadoc tasks. Furthermore, there's no javadoc in this
project, so it's moot right now.
Take care,
Sina
-----Original Message-----
From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Whapples
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 12:28 PM
To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Here's the draft design.
If the feeling is ant will be better for building then you will probably want
to look at creating a build.xml with a task for
running javadoc.
Anyway, point being, what ever build system is to be used will probably have a
way of running javadoc and that is more likely to be
portable to other platforms than a shell script.
Michael Whapples
On 26/11/10 16:15, John J. Boyer wrote:
> Laura,
>
> I'll probably have another draft by Monday when Yuemei is working. I'm
> glad you like this one. The shell script is for running javadoc and
> was included for convenience. The class file is probably for
> Jlouisutdml, the bindings, and was necessary to get some things to
> compile. javadoc won't document things that don't compile.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 06:27:41AM -0600, qubit wrote:
>> Hi John --
>> Well, aside from a few accidental inclusions -- such as a .class file
>> I saw somewhere, and a shell script to run javac, it looks ok.
>> I haven't read through all the stub docs.
>> But it is a first draft.
>> Perhaps Yuemei should comment on the word processor part. I wondered
>> about the selection of classes. But I'm not a UI expert.
>> I'm still looking at the rest of it.
>> Nice first cut.
>> --le
>>
>>
Other related posts:
