[brailleblaster] Re: Are we agreed to use maven?
- From: "John J. Boyer" <john.boyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:08:38 -0500
Right. We will probably need package-info.java in each package anyway. I
think you can go ahead.
John B.
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 07:34:24PM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote:
> Well it gets my vote.
>
> The only thing I will warn of, mercurial is unable to store an empty
> directory, therefore I will need to put suitable holder files in
> relevant directories (eg. either a Java class or may be
> package-info.java for the package level javadoc in java packages, etc).
> This isn't a problem just something everyone should be aware of.
>
> Michael Whapples
> On 30/07/10 16:27, John Gardner wrote:
> >Sounds to me as if there is broad agreement, so I vote yes.
> >John G
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer
> >Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:31 AM
> >To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [brailleblaster] Are we agreed to use maven?
> >
> >If so, I think we should give Michael Whapples the go-ahead to set up
> >the maven repository and also to set up empty directories in the
> >BraileBlaster repository that Maven expects.
> >
> >John B.
> >
> >
>
--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities
Other related posts:
