[brailleblaster] Re: Are we agreed to use maven?

  • From: Michael Whapples <mwhapples@xxxxxxx>
  • To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:34:24 +0100

Well it gets my vote.
The only thing I will warn of, mercurial is unable to store an empty directory, therefore I will need to put suitable holder files in relevant directories (eg. either a Java class or may be package-info.java for the package level javadoc in java packages, etc). This isn't a problem just something everyone should be aware of. 

Michael Whapples
On 30/07/10 16:27, John Gardner wrote:

Sounds to me as if there is broad agreement, so I vote yes.
John G


-----Original Message-----
From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:31 AM
To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [brailleblaster] Are we agreed to use maven?

If so, I think we should give Michael Whapples the go-ahead to set up
the maven repository and also to set up empty directories in the
BraileBlaster repository that Maven expects.

John B.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. brailleblaster
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2010