After hearing OTR on CD from the sites you listed ... well, one of them anyway ... I still maintain that the same standard of quality could be maintained on MP3 ... but not while putting anywhere near 50-100 shows on a single disk. I'm talking between nine and twelve shows. If you take a great-quality show and encode it in the MP3 format at 160kbps or more and using a sampling rate of 44,100, there's little to no difference in quality. Having said that, I emphasize the show must be of good quality before the encoding. A poorly-recorded show can only be maintained or worsened by MP3 compression. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Baechler" <bookshare@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 11:51 PM Subject: [other] [bookshare-discuss] Re: OT. Oldtime Radio site free for blind individuals > Hi. Naturally, you are going to be limited by cassettes in terms of > quality. I will say that even cassettes are generally much better quality > than mp3 though. You should try listening to OTR on CD. It really sounds > amazing if it has been restored with care. If you want to send me your > mailing address off list, I can send you a couple of restored CDs for your > comparison. Also, the closer they are to first generation, the better. > It > amazes me that people would throw away such good quality by the high > compression used for mp3. > > At 11:52 PM 4/30/2005 -0700, you wrote: >>A couple of years ago my kids gave us a collection or >>Old Time Radio audio cassettes. We played them on the >>tape player in the car; the quality was o.k. It >>brought back memories, since I used to listen to those >>programs growing up. > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.0 - Release Date: 4/29/2005 >