[bookport] Re: power
- From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 07:21:24 -0500
Yes, we are.
>>> n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:56:54 PM >>>
Just curious, you may not be able to answer this, are you guys still
working
with Springer for the new models?
----- Original Message -----
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:42 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: power
> Hi Sharron.
>
> I'm glad you like the direction the unit has gone over the last
couple
> years. Let me say that I think you will also be pleasantly
surprised
> with the future of the device.
>
> I have had Book Port serial number 2 for years without any battery
> contact problems either, and I doubt there are many people that read
> more than I do on the device, but I have seen contacts come in in so
> many conditions that I would also be very hesitant to use the springs
as
> well.
>
>
>
> >>> scfinchum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:48:50 PM
> >>>
> Larry,
> I have never had any problem with the contacts. My unit was one of
the
> first
> and I couldn't guess how many times the batteries have been changed.
> Triple
> A batteries are thinner. Rechargeable may be more economical. As I
have
>
> mentioned before, there are times when charging batteries is out of
the
>
> question. One of the reasons that I think that the spring type of
> connection
> may be better is because there isn't any question of which direction
> the
> battery installs. Thin would be nice, but only if the batteries were
> easily
> obtainable and near the price of current batteries.
> Of course, now that I have a Book Port addiction, I have to have my
> Book
> Port fix every day. The simple reading machine that I found so
amazing
> three
> years ago has become so much more. You and the Book Port staff have
my
>
> admiration and appreciation.
>
> Make it a grate one
>
> Sharon
>
>
Other related posts:
