[bookport] Re: bookshare periodicals
- From: "Walt Smith" <WSmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:51:23 -0400
I think that the answer is that the manual is written in HTML (the text
version is a byproduct and isn't what gets put on your BP). If a heading
is a level 1 heading, it becomes a section; if it's a level 2, 3, or
anything else other than a level 1, it's a subsection. This is what I've
figured out from looking at the source HTML file.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Westbrook
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:37 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookshare periodicals
Thanks. Just out of curiosity, how did you design the manual so that
the
main sections are the chapters and the subsections are the proper
subsections. I see there is a text file, so does that mean we can
create
files the same way? It looks like there is no way to specify that a
certain
section marker should be considered a subsection while another one could
be
a main section. Is that possible?
----- Original Message -----
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:26 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: bookshare periodicals
> Unfortunately, these are set up as if all the files will eventually be
> combined into a volume and each section will be a day, so now, you
have
> to use sub-section to move from item to item.
>
>>>> westbc@xxxxxxxxx Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:07:13 PM >>>
> I guess I was under the impression that I could move through bookshare
>
> periodicals with the main sections being the main sections of the
paper
> and
> the subsections being the article names, but that doesn't seem to be
> the
> case. I'm transferring the daisy file, the .opt file I believe it is.
> Is
> that the correct file or was I mistaken? I'd like to skip over the
> money
> section in usa today, for example, and move right to the next main
> section 1
> and 4 and three and six don't seem to work as intended. What am I
> missing?
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
