[bookport] Re: bookport Digest V2 #116
- From: "ptorpey" <ptorpey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:53:22 -0400
Well, I don't understand this behavior either for a CF card. Maybe I can
never use this folder again and must eventually delete it? This would mean
that you can't keep on putting books in a particular directory, wiping them
out, putting more, etc. without leading to degraded responsiveness.
In either case, this is very strange performance. Maybe the folks at APH
can enlighten us.
-- Pete
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:35:47 -0400
From: "MICHAEL MCCARTY" <mmccarty@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Sluggishness and number of books in folders
I was going at it from the aspect of files that you delete are not
really gone, but hidden from a users general use. I guess I was
thinking that the data, even though not used by the user, is still
there? Maybe I'm off with this thought?
Michael McCarty
Fred's Head Database Coordinator
American Printing House for the Blind
www.aph.org
>>> sduck@xxxxxxxxx 04/27/05 10:48AM >>>
Mike,
I don't think that defragmenting a flash card improves access speed
any.
When you defragment a hard drive, you improve access time because the
read/write head doesn't have to move around as much looking for the
information that it needs. Because a flash card is memory, it doesn't
have
any parts that have to move around, looking for information.
Therefore,
defragmentation of a flash card doesn't do anything, from a practical
sense.
At least this is my understanding.
Thanks,
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "MICHAEL MCCARTY" <mmccarty@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:26 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Sluggishness and number of books in folders
> Would running a Disk Defragger help to resolve this issue?
>
>
>
> Michael McCarty
> Fred's Head Database Coordinator
> American Printing House for the Blind
> www.aph.org
>
> >>> ptorpey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 04/26/05 08:28PM >>>
> I wrote to Larry and Rob off-line about this issue earlier today
since
> I
> didn't have access to my e-mail account which was subscribed to this
> DL.
> Anyway, I have more information on this problem now.
> My earlier report indicated that the responsiveness of the Bookport
was
> very
> slow for reading/navigating a book under the following conditions:
>
> 1. I am using the latest firmware (beta 27) and Bookport Transfer
> (version x.x.423)
> 2. This was a DAISY formatted book from Bookshare.
> 3. There were about 30 books in the folder.
> 4. The surprise (to me at least) was that the first 25 or so books
> in
> the folder had no problems. Reading/navigation was very responsive
> with
> these books. However, all books loaded onto the Bookport after the
> 25th or
> so book had the problem of poor responsiveness when reading.
> 5. Although APH has pointed out that we should minimize the number
> of
> books in any folder, I (mistakenly) thought that this only led to
> sluggishness when navigating from book to book, and not within a
> particular
> book. I guess this assumption was wrong.
>
> Since the "problem" books were all loaded recently (during the last
> beta or
> two), I thought that there might be a problem with either the newest
> beta
> firmware and/or transfer software. That appears not to be the case,
> and
> this seems to be more of a systemic problem.
>
> This evening, I performed the following tests to shed more light on
> the
> behavior and causes:
>
> 1. Re-downloaded one of the "problem" books into a new folder with
> only
> this book as an entry. Result - responsiveness was normal - no
> problem
> 2. Re-loaded one of the "problem" books into the original folder
> containing 30 or so books. Result: This appeared to overwrite the
> original
> book (the re-loaded book now appeared last in the list of books),
and
> responsiveness was still a big problem.
> 3. Deleted all but about 5 books in the original folder of about
> 30
> books. Result: Even with fewer books now in the folder, the
"problem"
> book
> still exhibited the very poor responsiveness it did when the folder
> was
> full.
> 4. Deleted the "problem" book from the original folder (now
> containing
> only about 5 books), and re-loaded it into this folder. Result -
The
> book
> STILL exhibited very poor responsiveness.
>
> Thus, it seems like once a folder gets clustered with too many books
> that:
> A. The responsiveness of reading/navigation within books loaded
> last in
> the folder will suffer.
> B. Even if books are deleted from a once crowded folder, any newly
> added books will suffer from poor responsiveness when
> reading/navigating
> within the book.
>
> Does this make sense? Do folders somehow get "trashed" if once
loaded
> up
> too much or will this occur even if the number of books at any one
time
> is
> kept small but many books are copied and subsequently deleted from
> this
> folder?
>
> Lastly, can this be rectified? Hopefully these observations are
> helpful in
> fixing this behavior if possible.
>
> -- Pete
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:18:08 -0400
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Firmware Beta 28
Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We are
not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:31:35 +0100
Hi Lary,
Things seem ok hear, note taking bug certainly fixed.
Best
-James-
----- Original Message -----
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:18 PM
Subject: [bookport] Firmware Beta 28
> Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We are
> not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Liam Martin" <noatman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:42:20 +0000
I was knocked off the mailing list for a couple of days and missed Beta 27.
Just wondering, what was the note taker bug that is now fixed?
Liam
>From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
>Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:31:35 +0100
>
>Hi Lary,
>
>Things seem ok hear, note taking bug certainly fixed.
>
>Best
>
>-James-
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:18 PM
>Subject: [bookport] Firmware Beta 28
>
>
> > Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We are
> > not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:40:28 -0400
From: "MICHAEL MCCARTY" <mmccarty@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
I will, as soon as I can get home to download the update. I can't get
it at APH because of the lockouts. It's like having someone holding my
hand while I work, very annoying.
Michael McCarty
Fred's Head Database Coordinator
American Printing House for the Blind
www.aph.org
>>> lskutchan@xxxxxxx 04/27/05 02:18PM >>>
Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We are
not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: "Claude Everett" <claudeeverett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] which one to buy?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:27:39 -0700
Hello, list,
Well, it looks as though, that the Book Port and BookCourier, from
watching the discussion on the lists, still have plenty of individual bugs
to work out.
Without getting too, technical, if anyone can these days. what features
convinced you, to buy the devise, you bought?
------------------------------
From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:29:02 +0100
Hi,
Basicly, it fixes the issue where the unit didn't report the line number
correctly on new note files. It was one of the bugs I reported. I
understand that your not looking for features but i'll suggest it for a
future upgrade. How about having a volume increment setting in the settings
list to define how much it moves up when holding the F Key down? What do
people think?
-James-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Liam Martin" <noatman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:42 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
>I was knocked off the mailing list for a couple of days and missed Beta 27.
> Just wondering, what was the note taker bug that is now fixed?
>
> Liam
>>From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
>>Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:31:35 +0100
>>
>>Hi Lary,
>>
>>Things seem ok hear, note taking bug certainly fixed.
>>
>>Best
>>
>>-James-
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
>>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:18 PM
>>Subject: [bookport] Firmware Beta 28
>>
>>
>> > Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We are
>> > not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Lou Kolb" <loukolb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: which one to buy?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:49:17 -0400
I bought the BP nearly 2 years ago. At the time, I felt that the slightly
higher price of the BP was more than offset by the longer list of file types
it handled. I also knew APH to be a solid organization which would likely
be supportive of and responsive to it's customers. I've seen nothing in the
interim to make me regret my decision. However, I must add that not having
a Book Courier, I can't comment knowledgably on it's strengths and
weaknesses. Lou
----- Original Message -----
From: "Claude Everett" <claudeeverett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: [bookport] which one to buy?
> Hello, list,
> Well, it looks as though, that the Book Port and BookCourier, from
watching the discussion on the lists, still have plenty of individual bugs
to work out.
>
> Without getting too, technical, if anyone can these days. what features
convinced you, to buy the devise, you bought?
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:54:25 -0500
From: "Sarah Cranston" <cranston.sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I like the volume suggestion, people could have the best of both worlds.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James Jolley
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:29 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
Hi,
Basicly, it fixes the issue where the unit didn't report the line number =
correctly on new note files. It was one of the bugs I reported. I=20
understand that your not looking for features but i'll suggest it for a=20
future upgrade. How about having a volume increment setting in the =
settings=20
list to define how much it moves up when holding the F Key down? What =
do=20
people think?
-James-
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Liam Martin" <noatman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:42 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
>I was knocked off the mailing list for a couple of days and missed Beta =
27.
> Just wondering, what was the note taker bug that is now fixed?
>
> Liam
>>From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
>>Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:31:35 +0100
>>
>>Hi Lary,
>>
>>Things seem ok hear, note taking bug certainly fixed.
>>
>>Best
>>
>>-James-
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
>>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:18 PM
>>Subject: [bookport] Firmware Beta 28
>>
>>
>> > Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We =
are
>> > not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's =
FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
>
>=20
------------------------------
From: "Grant Hardy" <granthardy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Book port specs
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:19:05 -0700
Yeah I'd be interested in knowing this, myself.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James Jolley
Sent: April 27, 2005 3:16 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Book port specs
Hi folks,
Could one of you guys at APH give us some real memory indicators for what
the Bookport can handle? I'm interested in exactly how much memory is
available for fermware upgrades and how much of it is being taken up with
todays beta version?
Best
-James-
------------------------------
From: "brandon hicks" <silverdart12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: which one to buy?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:32:06 -0600
hi,
i am going to be placing my order for the book port very very soon.
the reason i decided on the book port was because there have been many more
updates, the list is so much more active, the bp supports more filetypes,
and springer's updates generally don't happen when they are promised. Also,
the book port software has many more features than the book courier's, from
reading the manuals i'd say that the book port is generally a better
investment.
thanks
brandon
------------------------------
From: "Debbie Crafts" <debbiecrafts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Beta 27
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:09:41 -0400
Larry,
What are the time increments used to navigate unindexed files. Love this
feature, by the way, as I can now use my card reader and save the Bookport's
batteries. Thanks.
Debbie Crafts
Framingham, MA
debbiecrafts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: DCrafts
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of LARRY SKUTCHAN
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 12:48 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Beta 27
Basicaly, if you just copy a file to a card then put that card in BP,
you can use navigation commands to move through that file. This is a
great aid in podcasts and other mp3 files.
>>> r-carter@xxxxxxx Monday, April 25, 2005 12:43:21 PM >>>
Hi,
Beta 27 does seem to have fixed the cutting off of phrases in audio
files.
I have found no other problems so far.
Could someone explain what you mean by Book Port now supports
navigation
for unindexed mp3 files. What has changed. Are you talking about files
that
have not been sent via the transfer software? Are you talking about
files
that have been sent via the transfer software but that are just
straight
mp3 files like podcasts? How does one need to set the software to take
advantage of the navigation? Should the software be sent to treat the
files
as music or as audio?I don't see anything about this in the manual. Did
I
miss it?
Thanks,
Robert Carter
------------------------------
From: "Debbie Crafts" <debbiecrafts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] possible stability problems with latest software betas
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:38:59 -0400
Hello,
After downloading the latest betas of both the firmware and the transfer
tool, I attempted to transfer 21 mp3 files to the Bookport. I was speeding
these up, so used the transfer software. After transferring about 16 files,
Bookport transfer reported that it could not initialize the index file for
each of the other files to be transferred. When exiting and relaunching BP
transfer, was informed that the device was not connected. Unplugging and
replugging did not help. Was about to reboot, but decided to try resetting
the device and that appeared to work, although had to relaunch Transfer
manually after reconnecting. Just finished transferring the last five files
without any further problems, but since I haven't had similar problems
before, thought it was worth a mention. BTW: had just changed batteries
before beginning the transfer, so do not think this is the issue.
Debbie Crafts
Framingham, MA
debbiecrafts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: DCrafts
------------------------------
From: "Liam Martin" <noatman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Firmware Beta 28
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:41:24 +0000
Larry,
with Beta 26 I was given a message "Spanish unavailable." I had never heard
that before, and I thought it was deliberate - the Spanish option being
temporarily disabled. When I installed Beta 28, the Spanish option "Yes" or
"No" returned. But while I was in the Notes folder just now, the BP froze
and I had to remove the batteries. When I went to reset my options, I got
the "Spanish unavailable" message for the Spanish option. Any reason for
this?
Liam
>From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [bookport] Firmware Beta 28
>Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:18:08 -0400
>
>Please let us know of any old or new bugs you find in beta 28. We are
>not adding any new features, just bug fixes.
>
>Thanks.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
------------------------------
From: "Debbie Crafts" <debbiecrafts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Removing Folders
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:45:37 -0400
I strongly second that thought! Maybe with a warning and a second confirm
in the case where the folder to be deleted *does* contain files?
Debbie Crafts
Framingham, MA
debbiecrafts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: DCrafts
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of MICHAEL MCCARTY
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:53 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Removing Folders
Oh, there's a suggestion for the next beta then. I would love to be
able to remove folders, getting rid of several files at one time. I
download a lot of podcasts, and that would sure be a great feature.
Michael McCarty
Fred's Head Database Coordinator
American Printing House for the Blind
www.aph.org
>>> PRADER@xxxxxxx 04/26/05 08:50AM >>>
Files can be deleted on the BP, but folders can only be deleted
through
the software.
Pamela
>>> mmccarty@xxxxxxx 04/26/05 08:47AM >>>
Is there a way to remove folders with the BP? I know how to remove
them
with the BP software, but can it be done from the BP directly? I do
the
"B" and "E" keys, and it says that folders can't be removed.
Michael McCarty
Fred's Head Database Coordinator
American Printing House for the Blind
www.aph.org
------------------------------
From: "Joni Colver" <july77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: which one to buy?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:02:08 -0500
One person who gave me advice on the subject said that APH was more actively
involved in upgrading the Book Port and that promised features appeared more
quickly in the Port than the Courier. I have seen a lot of nice features
added since buying my Book Port. It is also quite evident that the APH
staff solicits and considers suggestions from people on this list and many
sugggestions have been implemented into new releases.
If you know Braille one big difference now is that the Port has a Braille
keyboard option to enter search strings and when the new beta is a final
release there will be the ability to take notes using the Braille keyboard.
I have never personally seen a Courier, but I haven't regretted my Book Port
purchase a year ago for a nanosecond.
Joni
------------------------------
From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Book port specs
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:16:35 -0500
Actually Larry, I'm curious, you wrote some great programs for the apple,
and a great screen reader for the pc, do you know how to program at all for
those kind of imbedded processors?
----- Original Message -----
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:22 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Book port specs
> We are tight tight tight in terms of available resources for code on
> Book Port.
>
>
> >>> james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:16:06 AM
> >>>
> Hi folks,
> Could one of you guys at APH give us some real memory indicators for
> what the Bookport can handle? I'm interested in exactly how much memory
> is available for fermware upgrades and how much of it is being taken up
> with todays beta version?
>
> Best
>
> -James-
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: which one to buy?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:28:59 -0500
Hi there. I actually have both, and they both have there strong points. The
book port is geared a bit more toward blind users, it provides features such
as reading by character, the ability to search for pauses in audio files,
and the ability to change the speed of audio files. The upcoming release of
the software will also allow you to write notes, assuming you know computer
Braille. The bookcourier has a few things the book port doesn't, namely a
key describe feature that will describe each key, and it does cost a bit
less, especially if you're a member of bookshare, or own the kurzweil 1000,
you can get a discount on a bookcourier this way. I do find the commands on
the courier a bit easier to memorize, this is not to say the book port's
interface is bad, just the way I learn I guess. Both units are exactly the
same size, and both use 2 aa batteries. Hope this info helps.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Claude Everett" <claudeeverett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:27 PM
Subject: [bookport] which one to buy?
> Hello, list,
> Well, it looks as though, that the Book Port and BookCourier, from
watching the discussion on the lists, still have plenty of individual bugs
to work out.
>
> Without getting too, technical, if anyone can these days. what features
convinced you, to buy the devise, you bought?
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Grant Hardy" <granthardy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookport] Re: Book port specs
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:26:10 -0700
Which screen reader is that?
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mike Arrigo
Sent: April 27, 2005 7:17 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Book port specs
Actually Larry, I'm curious, you wrote some great programs for the apple,
and a great screen reader for the pc, do you know how to program at all for
those kind of imbedded processors?
----- Original Message -----
From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:22 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Book port specs
> We are tight tight tight in terms of available resources for code on
> Book Port.
>
>
> >>> james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:16:06 AM
> >>>
> Hi folks,
> Could one of you guys at APH give us some real memory indicators for
> what the Bookport can handle? I'm interested in exactly how much memory
> is available for fermware upgrades and how much of it is being taken up
> with todays beta version?
>
> Best
>
> -James-
>
>
>
------------------------------
End of bookport Digest V2 #116
******************************
Other related posts:
