I think the note below is one of the most compelling reasons for using springs - i.e., as the clips age and many batteries are taken in and out, the clips tend to not hold the batteries in as tightly. Then, either the unit stops working because the batteries aren't making good contact, or the operation is more susceptible to being jostled around and the batteries will make intermittent contact as the unit is bumped. Then, the user is tempted to start bending the clips, with not too surprising results. I've seen this issue myself on other units with clips. ------- original note --- From: "Jerry Neufeld" <jerry.neufeld@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [bookport] Re: Clips or Springs Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:28:57 -0500 Good morning folks. I purchased my first BookPort unit just over one year ago. As I replaced batteries, long-life alkaline in this case, the snug fit I originally had gradually changed, sufficiently so that I lost connectivity, both during installation of new batteries and during actual reading. Although concerned about the fragility of the clips, I bent one slightly to provide a better connection. Again, with time, that clip returned to its old position, requiring another adjustment. The clip, as I feared, broke off at its base. We had to perform some rather difficult surgery in our lab to rebuild the connector. While springs do have their problems, I would strongly suggest that they be used in future releases of the hardware to avoid the problem that I had. As a poor work around solution, I have begun to use lithium batteries because of their very long life, thus requiring fewer replacements and less stress on the clips. If others are experiencing the loose battery problem that I had, I would suggest making a small square, about a centimeter in width and 3 millimeters thick, made from aluminum foil, to be inserted between the negative pole of the loose battery and the clip. Although a nuisance, this solution will be better than trying to work with a broken clip. Jerry