[bookport] Re: New Bookport ideas

  • From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:58:52 +1200

Hi Neal and list:

Have you found this to be true when proxemity is narrowed as well?

I believe making a unit any smaller will result in it being more easily lost, which is hardly a gain.

Cheers,
Dave
----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Ewers" <neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:24 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: New Bookport ideas



I think you will have a really hard time making the keys smaller.  The
testing we have done at Trace for various phone projects, A T M machines
and other products I can't mention has lead us to believe that you start
leaving out vast segments of the older population plus a number of other
people when you make the keys too small to use.  As it is now, the keys
are just about the dimensions of a standard telephone, plus or minus.
Well, and what is a standard telephone these days anyway, so perhaps
that is not a good example.  But I would caution against making them any
smaller than they are now.

Neal



-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 1:15 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: New Bookport ideas


What about keeping the keys the same size, but just moving them a touch closer together? My preference would be for much smaller keys much closer together, but I agree this would be a problem to people without the finger dexterity or precision. Bruce

--
Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave
the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV

Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Russ & Valerie wrote:

I agree that smaller keys will be a challenge for some.

My aunt is using a BP, and she can just manage the buttons as she is a

bit
frail and her fingers not always steady.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, 23 April, 2006 11 21 Subject: [bookport] Re: New Bookport ideas


A BP with smaller keys might be okay, but I do wonder about the
elderly or  multi-handicapped user's ability to manipulate something
that would enable  a  design of the size you mention here--a
cigarette pack. While I don't know  this to have been the case when
the original device was designed, the  present keypad certainly looks

as if this section of the potential market  was considered. I know
from experience and observation that many elderly  users just can't
cope very well with buttons the size most of us find  usable. Since
NLS, from what I gather, isn't planning to produce a truly  portable
player when they move to digital Talking Books, I can imagine APH
wanting to fill this gap, provided they can work with NLS to get the

necessary permissions and work out the technology, so these folks
would  absolutely have to be taken into account in any design
considerations.

 I think that on balance, I also like the idea of moving to SD cards
from  CompactFlash, particularly if industry forecasts indicate that
even  higher-capacity SD cards may be forthcoming in the future and
if NLS  decides  to move in that direction. Right now, 4 gig is the
largest available size  and if APH succeeds in removing all card size

limitations, I can see that  some folks may very well want to buy
even larger-capacity cards. My sole  concern about using SD cards is
their relative fragility when compared to  CompactFlash--I just see
them as being too easy to damage or lose.  CompactFlash is certainly
going to continue to be around for a long, long  time, given the
number of devices that are dependent on them, but using SD  would
certainly aid in designing a smaller player.

 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Tanner"
<david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 8:20 PM
 Subject: [bookport] Re: New Bookport ideas


It's size is about half to two thirds an inch thick, about 2 inches wide, and about 5 inches high. I am guessing it would need to be a bit larger than this unit in order to have decent size keys, but it would be nice if the BP could be a bit smaller; say the size of a cigarette pack.






-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.5/322 - Release Date: 4/22/2006










Other related posts: