[bookport] Re: Equals Signs in Messages
- From: "Dave Cunningham " <dcj638586@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:33:18 -0400
Well, apparently they figure they are better then the dreaded ads we =
were
getting. Well, they are but they are still a pain in the.... Well, you =
get
the picture. I had the same problem with the URL and the equal sign in =
it.
Dave
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve Cutway
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 9:20 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Equals Signs in Messages
Jeremiah:
Unfortunately, your theory applies to your message as well as it too=20
contains the "=3D" signs. (I don't know whether this message will also =
as I=20
don't get copies of my messages from the list, by choice.) Not all =
messages=20
posted have them though as Dave Allen's message yesterday didn't. But I=20
will agree with you that the "=3D" signs sure do play havoc with =
included
urls.
Cheers,
Steve=20
Other related posts:
