[bookport] A Short Primar on Mailing List Etiquette

  • From: "Eric StevenS" <sseric57@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:06:56 -0500

I hope everyone can benefit from this, but selfishly me most of all.  This 
list is quite active and can offer great information to everyone, but some 
here abuse our time with just the kinds of mail warned against in the 
attached.  Hopefully, this will be helpful in our other lists, too.  It is 
too bad when we have to forgo taking full advantage of a product, etc. 
because we simply cannot make the time to wade through the unnecessary, 
unhelpful, or off-topic postings.



Digital Web Magazine - How to Write Effective Mailing List Email.

Digital Web Magazine

The web professional's online magazine of choice.

How to Write Effective Mailing List Email.

In:
Articles

By
Matt Haughey

Published on December 28, 2001

With every passing day, increasing numbers of people are becoming web 
designers. One of the main forums for communication among web designers, 
both beginners
and experts alike, is the mailing list. Most mailing lists generate a 
substantial stream of useful, information-laden email, and the good ones 
enjoy a
healthy gift economy. I'm subscribed to a small handful of web-related 
discussion lists, and the busier ones average 20-40 messages per day. My 
favorite
list contains more useful information in a month's worth of postings than 
any best selling web design book. Even when I'm not asking or answering a 
question,
I can follow fascinating threads, picking up useful tidbits, and build rich 
archives of searchable information. When I ask a question, no less than two
or three expert answers will appear within a few hours. The people that read 
lists are often successful designers and busy experts in our field.

Yet even the best lists have their share of problems. I could pontificate 
all day on the nature of interpersonal communication, conduct, and 
netiquette,
but instead I want to focus on email content formatting.

Why is formatting so important?
The sum of my personal, work-related, and web discussion list mail is about 
100-150 messages per day. In order to get through that deluge, I 
automatically
filter every message into one of several categories, then into one of about 
20 folders within each category. Even though I organize all my messages, 
going
through a mailing list folder's 20+ new messages becomes a chore when most 
messages are improperly formatted. A properly formatted message is easy to 
read.
It's easy to respond to, and is most likely to be read by everyone and 
answered in a timely fashion.

So how do I format my messages?
There are several rules you can follow to improve the readability of your 
mailing list messages. The best place to start is to first read "
The Beginner's Guide to Effective email"
(don't let the name fool you, a seasoned expert could learn something from 
it as well). In addition to the information covered in that document, there 
are
several other things to keep in mind that are specific to web design mailing 
lists.

1. Quoting
Quote messages properly. The guide referenced above has
a pretty good explanation of proper quoting
(scroll down the page about halfway for the section on quoting). Basically, 
when you're going to answer a question, hit reply on your email client, then
delete every bit of the original post except for their question. Make your 
quoting as short as possible, but enough to properly explain the question. 
If
someone explained their problem in two paragraphs and then wrote a question 
at the end, I delete it all except for the question and maybe a sentence or
two from the explanation. I like to quote enough of a question so that 
someone that has missed the original post can figure out what someone was 
asking
and see my answer below.

Proper trimming and quoting is especially true for digest versions of a 
mailing list. Some folks choose to receive a single message with a day or a 
few
days' posts on them. It seems to happen once a month or so, but someone will 
reply to the digest version, leaving all messages quoted. Everyone on the
list will have to download and read a 60kb-100kb message just to read 
someone's comments, and worse yet, that post will go in the next day's 
digest, compounding
the problem.

Also remember to trim the ends of messages off. Most all mailing lists 
append every message with a special signature. This may be a couple, to 
several lines
of text. If you ever catch yourself responding to a question and leaving 
that footer in, before you hit send, ask yourself why. If it conveys no 
additional
information, as your answer will have it appended as well, why include it? 
It is useless and should be trimmed when replying (remember, your reply will
carry a copy of the footer too, so if it's useful once, it's useless when 
displayed two or more times).

2. Top Down Formatting
When you read a question in a message and want to answer it, you hit reply 
and your cursor is usually at the top of a new message, with the original 
quoted
below. If you start typing, your answer is displayed above the original. In 
fact, every email client I've ever used encourages you to write text above
an original message when replying. Why is that? This is probably the most 
important point I want to make. Don't write replies above the original 
message,
ever. Compose replies below the original message.

Imagine this example: if you left a note on the fridge for your roommates 
saying "When is the rent due?" and someone responded "On the first of the 
month,
stupid", would they write it above or below your original question? How do 
people on this planet read text? Some do it left-to-right, some 
right-to-left,
but when it comes to the vertical direction, everyone reads from the top 
down.

There's nothing more time consuming for me than to read an email that looks 
like this:


From: sara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sounds great. Sure, I'd love to go

> Sara - I have some of the mockups ready for the new Acme Designs
> Website. I have a meeting with the producer and one of the client
> reps tomorrow downtown. I'll be near your office building, do you
> want to meet to discuss our web-based project over lunch? What
> time is best for you?
>
> Matt

Reading a message like that requires me to remember the question asked, and 
in what context. If I can't remember, I have to scroll down read my original
post (if the recipient included it, this is even worse when they don't 
include the original in replies). Reading a answer like this, after 
scrolling down
to read the question, then back up for the answer is time consuming and if I 
get a few dozen messages like this a day, I won't have time for much more
than reading email. Often times, a short answer such as Sara's email will 
miss some of the questions in the original post. Proper formatting could 
solve
these problems and make life easier for both parties.

That same message would be so much easier on the reader if Sara would have 
sent it like this:


From: sara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 12:15PM, on Monday Dec. 3, 1999, Matt wrote:
> I'll be near your office building, do you
> want to meet to discuss our web-based project over lunch?

Sounds great. Sure, I'd love to go

>What time is best for you?

My schedule is free in the afternoon, just give me a call at 555-1212 - Sara

3. HTML/richtext email
My current email reader can display HTML email, but it's not a browser and 
doesn't do a very good job of it. I can quickly notice when an email comes 
in
with HTML formatting because the fonts will usually be too small or in a 
serif family that contrasts to the big sans-serif font I read mail with. 
Sometimes
an email message looks perfectly fine except for a silly signature font, or 
even a small picture.

There are numerous reasons why HTML email is bad, but on a mailing list, you 
want as many people to read your message as possible. To meet that goal, you
have to go for the lowest common denominator, plain text. Some people may be 
using PINE or some other Unix mailer that displays HTML as code, with a 
message
buried deep inside code. A busy mailing list member confronted with this 
situation will just delete your mail, or more likely, ignore and move onto 
more
accessible messages. HTML email also means that your two-kilobyte text 
message can quickly balloon into a 15-kilobyte file that everyone on the 
list has
to download. Having an HTML-aware email application also means that sending 
code can be buggy. A mailing list is a natural place to ask questions about
JavaScript functions or how to troubleshoot a difficult table, but many 
email readers will parse code, leaving readers with malformed messages or 
blank
screens filled with JavaScript errors.

If you have any doubts about how to turn off all special email formatting in 
your email client, try checking the
Rootsweb
site's
How to Turn OFF HTML or RTF in Various E-mail Software Programs
article.

4. Reply length
It's also important to think about the length of your replies. All too 
often, I'll see short, single sentence replies to complex questions, or 
short thank
you notes to people that posted answers. If you're sending a reply to a list 
that's only a sentence long, ask yourself if it's appropriate before 
sending.
When list members get a new message, it takes some effort to read that 
message. If the answer is a shot in the dark, or so brief to have to be 
explained
in subsequent emails, something is wrong. Also, thank you notes don't really 
benefit any of the list members besides the person that answered the 
question.
Send those thank you notes off list, directly to the person that answered 
the question.

5. Signatures
Signature files are generally a good thing, usually conveying additional 
contact information or a URL that other list members can look at to get a 
better
idea of who that person is. Your sig can let others know what you've been up 
to lately, what new sites you've done, and what site you call home. 
Signature
files become a problem when they are excessively long, taking up much of a 
message's space. First off, remember to keep them less than 80 characters in
width, to prevent the text from wrapping. A safe number for non-wrapping 
text would be in the range of 70-72 characters. Try to keep signatures in 
the
three-to-six line range of length. When a sig file takes up 12 lines of 
text, and the original message is just a sentence or two, it becomes hard to 
separate
the message from the signature. Originally, sig files were kept short to 
keep bandwidth down. With the advent of faster networks, this isn't much of 
a
problem anymore, but it's still important to keep a short sig file to keep 
your messages concise and as readable as possible.

Closing Thoughts
If you consider these tips the next time you participate in a mailing list 
discussion, I guarantee more people will read and understand your messages, 
leading
to more and better answers from other members. These tips will also make you 
a more considerate list member, as you'll be saving people time and keeping
your bandwidth use low. Enjoy and good luck out there.

Other related posts: