[blindreplay] Re: .rm, asf to .mp3 via PC-Audio list
- From: "Rick Alfaro" <rick.alfaro@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <blindreplay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:42:48 -0400
Hi, just a suggestion.
There is an option in settings in the other tab that will give more cpu
cycles when converting. Wonder if he has tried checking this to see if his
conversions go any faster? Taking more cpu might not be an issue on
hyper-threaded or dual core machines.
--Warmest regards,
--Rick Alfaro
--rick.alfaro@xxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: blindreplay-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blindreplay-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
petrakigianos-giasou@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:22 PM
To: blindreplay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blindreplay] .rm, asf to .mp3 via PC-Audio list
Note: This is only one person's experience with the conversions
from .rm, .asf to .mp3.
For Applian Tech and list members.
It's going to take at least 5-10 minutes to convert 1 hour audio
files anyway.
I saw this message on the PC-Audio list:
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:47:31 +1000
From: "Stephen Jolley" <stephenjolley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Replay A/V query
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <Pc-audio@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <000601c76f94$28ba7620$0f02a8c0@stephenrl2ipa3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm finding that conversion of "rm" or "asf" files to mp3 is
taking several
minutes (up to eight), and occasionally fails. These files are
only one hour or
about 20 meg in size.
The problem persists even with latest versions of 8.08 and
Replay Converter
2.75.
Anyone else's experience and suggestions would be appreciated.
Stephen Jolley
Melbourne Australia
--
To unsubscribe: e-mail blindreplay-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in
subject
To contact list owner: e-mail blindreplay-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe: e-mail blindreplay-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in
subject
To contact list owner: e-mail blindreplay-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
