[blind-democracy] Re: [blind-democracy] RE: [blind-democracy] Liberals’ furor against Trump fuels voice of the ‘war party’

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bob Hachey <bhachey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:08:46 -0400

I think the Militant's position on the attacks on Trump is that they are red herrings. That is, whoever the ruling class allows to be president is going to look after the interests of the ruling class and the rest of us should be concentrating on other issues like getting rid of the ruling class altogether. I tend to agree. After all, what if Trump is impeached and removed from office? Would Pence be any better? I don't think so. We would have to oppose him and his policies too. I will admit, though, that some of these articles that try to make that point have come perilously close to defending Trump and that makes me a bit uncomfortable. This article started out the same, but by the second half of it I think it was explaining what Trump really is all about. On my own part, though, I will say that Trump is a bit different from other presidents in that in this case rather than the ruling class installing one of their flunkies to administer the bourgeois state a member of the ruling class has decided to dabble in administering the bourgeois state himself. Another president may represent one or more factions of the ruling class, but when the president is a member of the ruling class himself he is more likely to represent only one faction and Trump may be a faction of his own. If this causes a rift in the ruling class then it could offer opportunities for the working class to take advantage of. The trouble is that if the rift becomes big enough then I suppose you can guess who will be forced to fight their civil war.


On 7/24/2018 7:58 AM, Bob Hachey wrote:

Hi Roger,
Interesting read here.
While I do believe that Russia did attempt to influence elections here and 
still are trying, I agree that it is more important for Putin and Trump to deal 
with other issues like Syria and nuclear stockpiles on both sides. Trump ought 
to be working on all three issues here.
I did think the post was too easy on Trump. Do you really think that Trump 
wants peace? IF so, then why is he advocating for yet more military spending? 
In his campaign, he rightly complained about how we ought to throttle back on 
bases around the world.
Trump keeps claiming that all investigations against him and his campaigns are 
witch hunts. IF that is so, then he should be willing to release his tax 
returns. The fact that he will not informs me that he has something to hide.
I am no fan of our military, FBI or CIA, but I'll also not take the side of a 
dictator like Putin. For a guy who claims to be tough, he really did look like 
Putin's poodle in Helsinki.
Bob Hachey




Other related posts:

  • » [blind-democracy] Re: [blind-democracy] RE: [blind-democracy] Liberals’ furor against Trump fuels voice of the ‘war party’ - Roger Loran Bailey