Hello. US officials are not competent to determine a decisive bill on
immigration. Well, at its inception, there is a critical question to ask.
Who is eligible to licitly settle there? Donald Trump and his conspicuously
notorious camp of racially favouring Caucasian hegemony are close to reveal
their intolerable stipulations. Presumptively, they wouldn't issue visas to
applicants from the middle east unless under one of the following
conditions. First, if someone comes from Israel. Second, if someone attempts
to betray his faith and nation. The latter, however, is quite popular among
immigration seekers from our region. It basically starts out as follows.
Someone becomes Christian and then, he demands instant immigration because
of alleged persecution. Without probation, supposed persecution claimants
are issued visas straightaway. This land is mostly for Islam haters,
racialists and
mischief-makers. They fallaciously expend September eleventh as a raddled
excuse to broadly instigate bigotry and xenophobia. Crucially, this is not a
rant against all US citizens. It's a mere repudiation of Americanism and its
sempiternal endeavours of coercively imposing Americanism ascendancy. Donald
Trump isn't particularly the prob. They rather are those who brought him to
oval office. The corruption in Washington's capitol is essentially based on
corporate warfare. Who would immigrate to a nation where human rights tenets
aren't even to go beyond zoning policies? Various US communities are
ethnically partitioned. It's easy to theoretically bring people from
different ethnic backgrounds to one place. However, the challenge stiffly
remains, how are they going to positively cope with each other? White people
are troubled with their black counterparts and vice versa. I'd like to ask
the following question to US embassies staff who happened to serve our
region. What is the proper legal procedure toward someone who purposely lied
about his own record and identity to obtain a visa? I think this question
desperately demands a denotative answer. If you know someone who works for
any US embassy somewhere in the middle east, please, pass that onto him. I
destine to intemperately counter Americanism fundamentals. Despite
governmental restrictions or the lack of anywhere in the world, I am fully
free to say whatever I want whenever I want. I don't need anyone's first
amendment to independently opine my beliefs and confident convictions. I
supremely believe in genuine autonomy. I intensely and openly criticise coup
pro protagonists here in Egypt. They're basically pure secularists who
endorse anti Islam sentiment. Some people prejudiciously assumed me knocking
the US in particular. Well, I'd like to notice you that I go farther in
criticism when it comes to domestic affairs. It's just not applicable to
post about that to mainly English speaking spectators. I speak up about that
in Arabic on my social media as for Facebook and Twitter. I wish everyone
fathoms now. To North America's residents, you are receiving this piece
sometime during Sunday afternoon, depending on your timezone. If you
necessitate a response, don't expect an interaction unless it's Monday
evening your time. Ultimately, I urge those who may ask for an interactive
thread to plainly indicate so in their subject field. Thank you, Bob
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
