Bob,
US immigration policy has always been problematic. Right now, you're hearing
all about Muslim bans. But the policies have always been discriminatory
against various groups. The only people who haven't been negatively targeted
are white people from western European countries like England, France,
Germany, Switzerland, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2018 11:40 AM
To: "Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@freelists.org
Subject: [blind-democracy] US and immigration laws
Hello. US officials are not competent to determine a decisive bill on
immigration. Well, at its inception, there is a critical question to ask.
Who is eligible to licitly settle there? Donald Trump and his conspicuously
notorious camp of racially favouring Caucasian hegemony are close to reveal
their intolerable stipulations. Presumptively, they wouldn't issue visas to
applicants from the middle east unless under one of the following
conditions. First, if someone comes from Israel. Second, if someone attempts
to betray his faith and nation. The latter, however, is quite popular among
immigration seekers from our region. It basically starts out as follows.
Someone becomes Christian and then, he demands instant immigration because
of alleged persecution. Without probation, supposed persecution claimants
are issued visas straightaway. This land is mostly for Islam haters,
racialists and mischief-makers. They fallaciously expend September eleventh
as a raddled excuse to broadly instigate bigotry and xenophobia. Crucially,
this is not a rant against all US citizens. It's a mere repudiation of
Americanism and its sempiternal endeavours of coercively imposing
Americanism ascendancy. Donald Trump isn't particularly the prob. They
rather are those who brought him to oval office. The corruption in
Washington's capitol is essentially based on corporate warfare. Who would
immigrate to a nation where human rights tenets aren't even to go beyond
zoning policies? Various US communities are ethnically partitioned. It's
easy to theoretically bring people from different ethnic backgrounds to one
place. However, the challenge stiffly remains, how are they going to
positively cope with each other? White people are troubled with their black
counterparts and vice versa. I'd like to ask the following question to US
embassies staff who happened to serve our region. What is the proper legal
procedure toward someone who purposely lied about his own record and
identity to obtain a visa? I think this question desperately demands a
denotative answer. If you know someone who works for any US embassy
somewhere in the middle east, please, pass that onto him. I destine to
intemperately counter Americanism fundamentals. Despite governmental
restrictions or the lack of anywhere in the world, I am fully free to say
whatever I want whenever I want. I don't need anyone's first amendment to
independently opine my beliefs and confident convictions. I supremely
believe in genuine autonomy. I intensely and openly criticise coup pro
protagonists here in Egypt. They're basically pure secularists who endorse
anti Islam sentiment. Some people prejudiciously assumed me knocking the US
in particular. Well, I'd like to notice you that I go farther in criticism
when it comes to domestic affairs. It's just not applicable to post about
that to mainly English speaking spectators. I speak up about that in Arabic
on my social media as for Facebook and Twitter. I wish everyone fathoms now.
To North America's residents, you are receiving this piece sometime during
Sunday afternoon, depending on your timezone. If you necessitate a response,
don't expect an interaction unless it's Monday evening your time.
Ultimately, I urge those who may ask for an interactive
thread to plainly indicate so in their subject field. Thank you, Bob
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
