It seems to me that throughout history, in most societies, men have had a
variety a female sexual partners. Sometimes this behavior has been accepted in
societies where a man having multiple wives is considered socially acceptable
or in societies where a married man discreetly having a mistress is acceptable.
Often, the behavior is frowned upon, but it happens anyway. Men's domination
over women and their sexual appetites, are certainly not specific to America or
Christianity. Human beings, after all, are biological creatures and they are
often motivated by their physical appetites. Physical aggression and sexual
behavior are just part of human nature.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 11:56 AM
To: Snider <ssnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sis <active.translator@xxxxxxxxx>; Jenffier
<sarah.jevnikar@xxxxxxxxx>; Monica <monica.pankratz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; abby <aevincent@xxxxxxxxx>; A. Fadden
<a.fadden18@xxxxxxxxx>; Allen Dicey <adicey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Brad
<brad@xxxxxxxx>; Chandler <chandler.boyce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Charlie Isbell
<charlie.isbell@xxxxxxxxx>; David <ddeagel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; David the Pastor
<dchauncey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Deborah Kerwood <dgkerwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Donald
Moore <don.moore48@xxxxxxxxxx>; Hannah <hanaekasmi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Heather Judson
<hljadds@xxxxxxxxx>; Heather Kentucky <hburgess2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Heather of
Minnesota <busseheather.93@xxxxxxxxx>; Iman <imen_12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Jakob
Jackson <heliconia844@xxxxxxxxx>; James F. Holwell <mathscoach@xxxxxxxxx>;
Jason Meyerson <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jenifer
<jennifer.brallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Jenn Hanna <jennhanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Jessica <jbz75@xxxxxx>; Jews <jfj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joe
<joeharcz@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Kane <kbrolin65@xxxxxxxxx>; Nancy
<nancy.pankratz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Natallie <natalie.boyce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; North
Carolinian <dwayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paul California <wickps@xxxxxxxxx>; Peter
the hater <blackbelt48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pia <pmikeal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Rev Mark
<revmarkgreen@xxxxxxxxx>; Rick Harmon <rharmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
robynbloomquist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Southern <wuas@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sam
<sam_shmn@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Steve Well <steve@xxxxxxxx>; Susan Moore
<susan@xxxxxxxx>; Swine <ebjwiz@xxxxxxxxx>; Yuri <yuri@xxxxxxxx>; Washington
Post 5 <eilperinj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Washington Post 4
<eugenerobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Washington Post 3 <ed.okeefe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Washington Post 2 <mike.debonis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Washington Post
<elise.Viebeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Canadian <angelgal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [blind-democracy] The west and social values
Hello. During his term, former president Bill Clinton was enormously disgraced
with White House intern. She was called, Monica Lewinsky. He was frantically
enamoured with her. She was reportedly portrayed as Bill Clinton's coquette.
She was broadly delineated as an imperilling seductress.
How was she possibly capable of consensually beguiling the stiffest chief of
the world at that time? Her initial attraction with Bill Clinton was of him
being the president of the United States. Later at the horrendous aftermath of
their scandalous relationship, Monica confessed in an interview with Barbara
Walters, that she indeed fell in love with this man. Certainly, she had her
affectionate and sensual motives for that. Astoundingly, during the period of
her relationship with Bill Clinton, she had another man in her life. This
perturbing chronicle of Bill and Monica had been reciprocally injurious to
their reputation. Furthermore, it justly raised reasonable concerns about
American moral standards. During her relationship with former president Bill
Clinton, she became pregnant with her second intimate mate. Shamelessly, Bill
Clinton knew about her affair with another man. He just didn't know she was
expecting. American social lifestyle is notoriously filled with such
opprobrious instances. Where does this primitively come from? It basically
comes from some parentally unguided biblical accounts.
You may optionally cite that in part of Lot's account with his two daughters in
the Bible. Please be noticed though, it contains incestuous description that
you may not appropriately hear about. According to the Bible and the Koran, Lot
was a notable patriarch. He was nephew of Abraham. Allah destroyed Sodom and
Gomorrah for disobeying him and insistingly committing homoeroticism. He glory
be to Him Willed to spare Lot and his partly believing family who were told to
flee without looking back at the awful doom of their people. This is mentioned
in both, the Bible and the Koran.
What comes next though, is solely paltered in the Bible. It has disingenuously
been inserted into the Bible. Unlike many southern evangelists, we do not
destine to wholly defame the Bible. We despise the manner by which they
purposely denigrate and misquote the Koran. We genuinely believe in all divine
revelation. But, if you think Lot's biblical account with his two daughters was
divinely inspired, you desperately demand to revise the moral stance of your
belief. This is why, I basically recognise Christianity to be ethically
profaned. If any faith doesn't urge
piety and elevate its embracers to the grace of the celestial realm,
that is emphatically a corrupt, inadequate and ineligible path. Christianity
generically is tolerant with involvements in illicit wedlock. Maintaining your
virginity as a girl in a western society is quite a challenge. Although
adultery is outlawed in mass Christendom, it doesn't punish its denotative
culprits. It is odd to find women who stuck to their virginity until they
licitly get married. Lastly, I did not intend to bait people with this critical
conversation. I just meant to exculpate Islam from this oppressive portrait,
which often involves prejudice and incorrect pieces of information.
Orientalists claim Islam suppressed women. Western orientalists have
deliberately tarnished its immage, hoping to deter people from listening to
what Islam is. In respect to social values, Islam calls its followers to adhere
celibacy. It enjoins them to avoid inappropriate types of friendship, as of
these between men and women, particularly online chats and so on.
Unfortunately, I at some point fell in disgrace and committed sins with some
women online. I even betrayed my spouse in our honeymoon.
This was indeed extremely deleterious to her. I confessed to her and
unfeignedly repented. I now work on avoiding these vicious relationships on the
internet. The first thing I did, I permenently shut all portals of social
media, as of Skype, Facebook etc. At first, I felt it is inconvenient but now,
and after the glorious month of Ramadan, I am sufficiently contented with what
I did. If you would like to listen to my humble piece of advice, do not waste
your time, talking to strangers online for purposeless entertainment. I
committed major offences in my faith as a result of this.
Now, As I have repented, I reordered my set of priorities, including how should
I spend my spare time. We do not kill time in Islam. We rather invest it.
Inshallah, I won't ever flirt or have intimate talks but with my licit spouse.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
