Mustafa, the reason you draw so much disrespect onto yourself is not
because of your specific religion. It is not because of the country in
which you live. The reason is that you harass people with your religion.
If you want to be respected you have to be willing to give respect.
Harassment is not giving respect. Try having a discussion now and then
in which you do not try to push religion on anyone. Let it be known that
you are a Muslim and then drop it. And remember this. When you push
Islam on people who are not interested in it you make them identify
Islam with that practice. You make them hate Islam. If you have polite
discussions with people without always pushing religion you just might
find that some people will even like you. Instead you choose to goad
people into despising you for trying to force your religion on them.
___
Neil deGrasse Tyson
“God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance.”
― Neil DeGrasse Tyson
On 3/25/2020 6:43 PM, Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
Hello everyone, my name is Mustafa. I periodically send my posts to
various recipients as of individuals and lists. For some people
though, because of my opinion and spiritual based sentiment, I am
intently snubbed and rather possibly despised. Americans constantly
chant democracy song. Nonetheless, if they are criticised by those
whom they unjustifiedly consider lowlier, they are no longer
democratic. Interiorly, they tolerate critique. But, as to Mustafa,
the Muslim guy from Egypt, he is not worthy to be equally ranked with
us. He comes from a poorly developing nation. In addition, he embraces
religion. Thence, he is not worthy of deference. According to their
own standards, I am not sufficiently adequate to be honoured.
Americans allegedly condemn judgmental people. Nonetheless, they are
free to judge and classify others. So for instance, Roger, the Atheist
moderator of a list called blind democracy, puts at the end of each
thread a key signature, resembling a quote that is anti religious in
essence. He has, the right to do so, because he is American, white,
the moderator and, ah, he’s just a senseless satirist, good at
derision. He’s backed by everyone in the list because I am not
affiliated into their notion of ridiculing faith. One of them, a
senior lady claimed that I just couldn’t criticise the brutal
practices of my government and I merely chase Americans to bait them.
Well unfortunately, she prejudiciously presumed so. She doesn’t know
me well nor she has any idea about my domestic online activities,
sternly criticising the de facto coup based regime of my country. It
is decisively factual for me, that Americans are obsessed to criticise
but they couldn’t bear being criticised. Roger hates religion and I
beat him over head with it. Well, could someone tell me then, what’s
the proper solution within Atheism for this ongoing mass epidemic? As
we now see, empirical science stands utterly futile in the face of
this enormously global threat. Could the crisis be possibly solved
with typical western decadence? What has congressional statute done so
far to rectify the situation? Am I being unworthy of genuinely
representing my actual character for my espoused belief, regional base
or otherwise? I thought Americans plainly promote for free expression
and nonpartisanship. Well honestly, we’re witnessing a substantially
shameful status, a radically hypocritical stance. Is anyone here
interested to keenly fend for Americanism?
