https://socialistaction.org/2017/03/19/labor-briefing-march-2017/
Labor Briefing: March 2017
/ 2 days ago
By BILL ONASCH
A Clean Win For Janitors—It took six years of strikes and
demonstrations, but the tenacity of 600 Twin Cities janitors, nearly all
people of color, many of them immigrants, has secured a first union
contract. It was a tripartite struggle. These members of SEIU Local 26
actually clean Big Box retail stores like Target, Best Buy, and Macy’s.
But their paychecks come from janitorial service companies contracted by
these high-profile merchants. The pressure on these retailers, who
didn’t like being associated with the ruthless exploitation by their
contractors, is what finally won a first agreement that can win even
better future gains. This concludes the Good News section of this
month’s Briefing.
Fake News—I received a gushing e-mail from Jobs with Justice about a
“breakthrough settlement” ending a 105-day strike at the Momentive
Performance Materials chemical plant in Waterford, N.Y. I am always
eager to find some upbeat labor stories, so I did some digging. I found
a comprehensive description of the deal, brokered by Democrat (and
Working Families Party) Governor Cuomo, in the Albany Times-Union, a
paper often giving fair coverage to unions.
That paper’s honest reporting made clear that the breakthrough benefited
only the hedge fund vulture owners determined to make Momentive more
attractive for a “flip” to another buyer. The final deal was even more
onerous than what the workers in two IUE-CWA locals had overwhelmingly
rejected when they went on strike in November.
Retiree health insurance was eliminated and active worker benefits
greatly reduced. A week of vacation time was lost. The signing bonus in
lieu of a wage increase was further slashed from the pre-strike offer of
$3000 to $1000. And the agreement did not guarantee reinstatement of 27
workers fired for “strike misconduct.”
I would never second-guess workers, most with families to support, who
after going without pay for more than three months reluctantly decide it
was time to go back to work with their union intact to fight again
another day. Even then, the vote in the main local of production workers
was no slam dunk—317-211 to accept the Governor’s deal.
I don’t know enough about the union’s strategy and tactics to rush to
judgment of a “sell-out.” Sometimes the relationship of class forces
confounds even ably led unions. There is no dishonor in losing a bravely
fought battle. But those who try to spin a devastating defeat in to a
breakthrough victory deserve nothing but contempt.
The Decline of the Strike—In last month’s Briefing, we looked at the
annual report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that showed another
decline in union membership and density numbers. This month we’ll deal
with the BLS report on strikes.
While there was actually a slight uptick in the number of strikes,
strikers, and strike durations last year over 2015 numbers, it is
unlikely this indicates a reversal of the decades-long decline in these
stats. The big CWA-IBEW strike against Verizon is what swelled the 2016
figures.
However, there are some caveats to keep in mind in analyzing the
downward trend. The BLS only counts strikes or lockouts of 1000 or more
workers. The Momentive strike that began last year is one example of
those too small to be counted. A thousand was a more reasonable cut-off
when these reports began in 1947. But private sector workplaces have
been greatly reduced in size by technology and outsourcing. National
contracts that once covered tens, even hundreds of thousands of workers
are today rare, and the few remaining have shrunk drastically. Nor are
short strikes by workers without a certified union—such as the Twin
Cities janitors and thousands of fast-food workers—tallied.
But these factors, which also contributed to union membership loss,
don’t fully account for the much steeper decline in strikes that have
plummeted over the last few decades. From 1967-76 there were 3321 major
strikes. For 1987-96 that number was down to 404. In the just concluded
2007-16, there were only 143.
The Labor Briefing format is inadequate for an in-depth analysis of the
factors leading to this paucity of strikes—the traditional “ultimate”
workers’ weapon in the class struggle in the workplace. It certainly
involves a dominant trend of the mainstream union bureaucracy to seek
“partnership” with the boss. This leads to peaceful surrender of hard
won past achievements in wages and conditions—especially through odious
tiered wages and benefits affecting only new hires, undermining solidarity.
The IAM’s Debacle In North Charleston—The class collaborationist
bureaucracy that abhors strikes also poisons organizing
efforts—dramatically illustrated last month in the dismal failure of the
IAM’s drive to organize Boeing’s runaway plant in North Charleston,
South Carolina. The final vote was 2097-731. The IAM vote total shMArch
2017 Boeingowed they lost the support of more than 700 workers who had
signed union authorization cards that led to the election.
Most early commentators speculated that the Machinist organizers had
gone off half-cocked and didn’t do the necessary home visits and
community outreach. That the election was premature is valid—but that
decision was made several pay grades above the organizers on the scene.
All indications show that the field organizers used all the best
practices. They were assisted by the small but militant local labor
movement—especially the predominantly African-American Longshore and ATU
transit locals. They spent an allowed $20,000 on television advertising.
Of course, as could be expected, the company, and the area Chamber of
Commerce, spent a lot more money warning that unions would block
economic growth. Boeing used their “captive audience” meetings with
workers to not only slander the union that is a “partner” in Seattle and
other places, but also exposing some inconvenient truths.
They revealed not only the rotten sell-out deals the International
leaders had imposed at Harley-Davidson but also at Boeing in Seattle.
There the top bureaucracy collaborated with Boeing and state politicians
against the local union to force a contract reopener with enormous
give-backs. Undoubtedly, many in South Carolina concluded they didn’t
need a union to negotiate cuts in wages and benefits.
Mike Elk, Michael Schreiber, and Adam Shils contributed to this month’s
Briefing. If you have a story appropriate for this column please contact
billonasch@xxxxxxxxxxx. Photo: A Boeing work in North Charleston, S.C.
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
123Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)123
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
March 19, 2017 in Labor.
Related posts
Labor Briefing by Charles Walker
Houston Janitors Walk Out
Fast food strikers say: $15 and a union!
Post navigation
← Film classics: Irish socialist portrayed in ‘Jimmy’s Hall’
Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month March 2017 (9) February 2017 (19)
January 2017 (13) December 2016 (12) November 2016 (19) October 2016
(12) September 2016 (10) August 2016 (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016
(14) May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8)
January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015
(8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9)
May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11)
January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014
(9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10)
May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11)
January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013
(17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013
(15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013
(10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October
2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June
2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012
(19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October
2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June
2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February
2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1)
October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7)
June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February
2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5)
October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February
2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008
(12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14)
February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007
(1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1)
February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006
(13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006
(7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5)
January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005
(13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005
(16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005
(19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October
2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May
2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15)
December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001
(19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August
2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000
(22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December
1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18)
August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April
1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July
1998 (12)
Search
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Upcoming Events
After the Women's March: Which Way Forward?
March 24, 2017 at 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm
Elmwood Community Center, 1106 New Britain Ave., West Hartford, Connecticut
Category Cloud
Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada
Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools
Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International
Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History
Middle East National Oppression Police & FBI Prisons South Asia
Uncategorized Vote Socialist Action Women's Liberation
View Calendar
Blog at WordPress.com.
