"...like the Democrats and Republicans, Bernie Sanders, the Greens and
the Libertarians all support capitalism in one form or another. To
truly get at the heart of the problems we face today, a revolutionary,
anti-capitalist perspective needs to be weighed alongside the other
voices."
Weighed, yes. But then the next step is to organize a peaceful take
over of the American Empire...just as the Pentagon/War Profiteers has
done.
If we can pull that off, we will then be ready to click our heels
together and chant, "There's no place like home".
Carl Jarvis
On 10/28/16, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://socialistaction.org/2016/10/25/a-socialist-joins-the-2016-presidential-debates-part-i/
A socialist joins the 2016 presidential debates, Part I
/ 3 days ago
By BRUCE LESNICK
Usually the U.S. presidential debates are more about personalities than
politics. The phony Commission on Presidential Debates, deeply in the
pocket of Democratic and Republican parties, serves as a fig leaf to
mask the shamefully narrow discussion that passes for democracy in “The
Greatest Country On Earth”™. But living in the 21st century, we do not
have to accept the limitations that those in charge would use to hem us
in. With technology at our service, we can present a real, broader debate.
According to imperial decree, we are only allowed to hear from the two
candidates that represent Wall Street and corporate America. Both the
Democrats and Republicans have a long history of supporting
pro-corporate, anti-labor policies, with initiatives that promote
racism, sexism, exploitation, and environmental destruction. How do we
know? Because together those two parties have been running the country
for hundreds of years and the proof is in what we see all around us.
All serious candidates—including Jill Stein of the Green Party and Gary
Johnson of the Libertarian Party—should be included in the debates.
Doing so could only broaden the discussion. But like the Democrats and
Republicans, Bernie Sanders, the Greens and the Libertarians all support
capitalism in one form or another. To truly get at the heart of the
problems we face today, a revolutionary, anti-capitalist perspective
needs to be weighed alongside the other voices. To that end we bring you
an expanded debate, where socialist “Sydney Solidarity” squares off
against the twin candidates of the ruling rich.
The first presidential debate of the 2016 campaign took place Sept. 26,
moderated by Lester Holt. Below are Solidarity’s responses to each of
the debate questions. In this segment, we deal with basic questions of
the economy. A later segment will highlight Solidarity’s response to
questions concerning climate change, Black Lives Matter, and war. Lester
Holt’s comments are edited for flow. A transcript of the actual, limited
debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton can be found here.
* * *
Lester Holt: We’re calling this opening segment “Achieving Prosperity.”
And central to that is jobs. There are two economic realities in America
today. There’s been a record six straight years of job growth, and new
census numbers show incomes have increased at a record rate after years
of stagnation. However, income inequality remains significant, and
nearly half of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.
Why are you a better choice than your opponents to create the kinds of
jobs that will put more money into the pockets of American workers?
Sydney Solidarity: Thank you. The primary difference between socialists
and the parties represented by Mr. Trump and Ms. Clinton, is that
socialists tell the truth about the class divisions in our society and
all that these imply. Mr. Trump and Ms. Clinton would have you believe
that there is one America, one team, with everyone in the same boat and
everyone pulling toward the same goal. This is a conscious deception.
As socialists, we recognize that the 99% and the 1%—those who produce
all of the nation’s wealth, versus those who, through various schemes,
collect, control and oversee the disposition of that great mountain of
wealth—have opposing and conflicting interests. The interests of Wall
St, the giant insurance companies and corporate conglomerates are
different from those of working people.
Socialists argue that our current economic system is fundamentally
undemocratic because those who produce all of the wealth have no say in
how it is put to use, and those who control most of the wealth had
nothing to do with creating it. As such, socialist solutions to current
problems take into account the injustice of the current setup and we are
not bound by the artificial constraints adhered to by the pro-capitalist
candidates.
Socialists say a job is a right that should be guaranteed to all, at
union wages. There is plenty of work that needs to be done and plenty of
money to pay for it. To immediately put everyone back to work, we would
launch a massive public works program to build and repair
infrastructure, schools, parks and neighborhood health clinics;
construct fast, cheap, efficient mass transit within and between each of
our cities. We would invest heavily in research, development and
construction of safe, renewable energy technologies like solar, wind,
geothermal, tidal and more.
To pay for all of this, we would eliminate the more than $600 billion
war budget, which is used by the 1% to defend their interests and impose
their will on the 99% at home and abroad. Finally, we would institute a
steeply graduated income tax, with working people paying no tax, those
earning more than $200,000 taxed at an increasing rate for each
additional $10,000 of income, up to a top tax rate of 100% for any
income over a million dollars. All types of income, including interest
and capital gains, would be treated the same. This may sound radical,
but we should remember that the top US tax rate from 1954 to 1963 was 91%.
Solidarity now responds to the comments by the other candidates.
In her remarks, Ms. Clinton paid lip service to clean energy, equal pay
for equal work, a fair minimum wage, affordable childcare and debt-free
college education. This sounds enticing, until you remember that the
political parties that Ms. Clinton and Mr. Trump represent have been in
power for generations, during which time the record on all of these
issues has been abysmal. Democrat Barak Obama has bragged about his “all
of the above” energy policy, off-shore drilling and building enough “new
oil and gas pipeline to circle the Earth and then some.” In the first
two years of Obama’s presidency, with a Democratic majority in both
houses of Congress, absolutely nothing was done to advance the cause of
equal pay, affordable childcare or the rest.
Socialists, on the other hand, don’t just talk. We are active every day
in movements in the streets to stop environmental destruction, halt the
murders of African Americans and other minorities by racist cops,
provide free childcare for all, guarantee abortion on demand, guarantee
equal rights for all, fight for $15 and a union, halt the imperial war
machine and bring all US troops home now.
In his remarks, Mr. Trump promised to halt the flight of U.S. companies
overseas by cutting corporate taxes. This while his own business has
extensive offshore operations. With unemployment up and real wages down,
working people are indeed suffering. But in proposing to create jobs by
cutting corporate taxes, Mr. Trump forces the rest of us to either pay
more or get by with less. It’s highway robbery and the choice is a
familiar one: “Your money or your life!”
Holt: Let me follow up with Mr. Trump, if you can. You’ve talked about
creating 25 million jobs, and you’ve promised to bring back millions of
jobs for Americans. How are you going to bring back the industries that
have left this country for cheaper labor overseas? How, specifically,
are you going to tell American manufacturers that you have to come back?
Solidarity: Socialists say that a job is a universal right. No one
should ever have to go without a job—a good job, at union wages. Mr.
Trump and Ms. Clinton say that they’re for jobs too, but it’s not true.
In fact, they’ve got a big problem. The so-called free enterprise
system, which they both worship, which Ms. Clinton says “built the
greatest middle class in history,” absolutely depends on having millions
of unemployed, underemployed and super exploited workers.
Under capitalism, full employment is impossible. Why? Because if
everyone had a job, the balance of power between workers and employers
would be significantly altered. Workers could demand higher pay and the
boss would have no choice but to agree. Workers could go out on strike,
and there would be no one to use as strikebreakers.
In a rational system, if any public need was not being fulfilled, people
would be put to work fulfilling it. And if putting everybody to work
full time would result in too much being produced—if full employment at
40 hours per week would produce more than what society needs—then the
sensible thing to do would be to reduce the work week with no reduction
in pay, dividing the necessary work among everyone. If you put human
needs before profits, it’s easy to have jobs for all.
But if your first loyalty is to profits, as is the case for Democrats
and Republicans, then these simple, rational solutions can’t be
considered. Democrats and Republicans are for creating jobs only if it’s
profitable to do so. That’s why their proposals always involve giving
money to corporations and the rich.
Mr. Trump and Ms. Clinton point to the current economic downturn to
explain why unemployment is so high. But what they don’t tell you is
that regular, periodic crises, such as the one we are currently
suffering through, are themselves a direct result of putting profits
before human needs. The way our economy is organized, there’s a
recession or depression every five or ten years. No Democratic or
Republican proposal has ever changed that.
From an early age, we’re taught—and Mr. Trump and Ms. Clinton will try
to tell you—that these economic downturns just kind of happen, like
thunderstorms. But that’s not true either. These crises occur when the
economy produces more than can be sold at a profit. It’s then that
businesses cut back, close down, lay off workers, and wait until profit
potential improves. No consideration whatsoever is given to whether
there are unmet needs; whether people are hungry, or homeless, or
jobless, or poor. But the most outrageous part of all is that, with the
current profit-driven system, the system President Obama has called “the
greatest engine of prosperity the world’s ever known,” crises and high
unemployment occur not when there’s a scarcity of productive capacity or
goods that everybody needs, but when there’s too much!
To guarantee jobs for all, we would immediately reduce the workweek with
no reduction in pay. Can we afford this? Absolutely. While most of us
are suffering from the current recession, those at the top are doing
quite well. U.S. corporate profits are near an all-time high. Profits
for the five most profitable Fortune 500 corporations were up an average
of 30% in 2015. Jobs for all is possible and practical, but only if we
reject the narrow framework of the Democrats and Republicans and instead
put people before profits.
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
October 25, 2016 in Economy, Elections, Vote Socialist Action.
Related posts
Socialist Action sponsors election debates
June 2016 Grumpy Bernie
Bernie Sanders’ demise: What are the lessons?
Jeff at mike
Interview with Socialist Action’s presidential candidate, Jeff Mackler
Post navigation
← Green Parties: The real history
A socialist joins the 2016 presidential debates, Part II →
Vote Socialist Action!
Jeff Mackler for President and Karen Schraufnagel for Vice President
More information:
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month October 2016 (10) September 2016 (10)
August 2016 (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (9) April
2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11)
December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015
(10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10)
April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10)
December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014
(6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11)
April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11)
December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September
2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013
(14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013
(17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September
2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012
(19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012
(17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September
2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011
(19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011
(15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September
2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9)
April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9)
December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009
(3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April
2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10)
December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September
2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008
(2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008
(11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1)
April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11)
November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006
(11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March
2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
(9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March
2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14)
November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002
(21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15)
January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September
2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September
2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000
(21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000
(20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September
1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
(27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999
(24) July 1998 (12)
Search
Get Involved
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events
View Calendar
Blog at WordPress.com.
