[bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?

  • From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:33:18 -0700

Hi, Kaitlyn. By all means, if you submit a book that is pre-validated, feel 
free to put that in the comments field. That might give a validator looking for 
an easy validation the incentive to grab it. Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kaitlyn Hill 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:02 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?


  Hi Jana, 

   

  I know about the perfectionist bug. I have a numbers of books to upload but I 
might as well do the proff reading before upload. Is it alright to make a note 
in the comments field when I know a book have been read through? 

   

       Kaitlyn
  No one is given a dream without also being given the power to make it come 
true

  Reconnective Healing energy Practitioner
  Numerologist, Get your personal reading

  Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take but by the number of 
moments that take your breath away:) 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jana Jackson
  Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 5:33 PM
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?

   

  Hi, Kaitlyn!  Correcting those errors is up to you.  Lately, a lot of us have 
been bitten by the perfectionist bug when it comes to validating, so I have to 
say that personally, I'd fix them. <Smile>  Hope this helps!

   

  Jana

   

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: siss52 

    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

    Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:38 PM

    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?

     

     

    Hi Caitlin,

     

    Some validators would correct those errors, and others would not.  For this 
reason a lot of us who do manual corrections pick books we would like to read.  

     

    Sue S.

     

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Kaitlyn Hill 

    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

    Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:03 PM

    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Reviewing a book?

     

              Hello All, 

               

              I am working on a book that from the first 50 pages of it seems 
only to have an error maybe 2 per page but is still very readable. The major 
errors are in dates such as. I984 instead of 1984. What are the feelings on 
errors of this type?

               

Other related posts: