Hello, I'll admit up front that I'm not an expert on the various laws dealing with current access to printed books in electronic format. I have a basic understanding of the different laws and such but would like to toss an idea out for consideration. I read here once in a while about the high speed scanning of books done by the folks at Bookshare and think how many books that process scans with the same amount of effort it takes me to scan a single book. So then I think that maybe I should go invest in a high speed scanner. Then my ideas are tempered by the fact that I doubt my public library would appreciate me cutting the bindings off books. I eventually come to ask myself why my tax dollars are not doing more to make printed books accessible? My basic thinking goes like this: Libraries around the country spend hundreds of millions, if not billions of public dollars purchasing books from the publishing industry. For example according to the current King County library budget, approximately 7.5 million dollars will be spent this year buying printed books by that library system. So, what if all the libraries spending this public money said the public purchasing of books would stop until publishers agreed to provide electronic versions of books to an organization like Bookshare for distribution in accessible alternative formats? I'm no expert here so don't know if the public money spent would be missed by the publishing industry. I recognize this is a very simplistic example just now but wonder what folks with more knowledge in the area think? Kelly