[bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsislost
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:38:24 -0500
Pam, that was the old bug. The new bug behaves much more simply. It
don't matter no mo' whattch ya do. De bad woids in them synapsuses is
gonna be goane!
G.
Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone: (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html
Pam Quinn <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/16/2004 05:34 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: New/old Bookshare bug -- Long and short synopsis lost
When that happened to me for the first time, I figured it was because
I was replacing a book and the original did not have a synopsis. Guess
that wasn't the case then.
Pam
Original message:
>Attention submitters and reviewers. Any short synopsis, long synopsis,
>and category assignments you may have made to a book record during
>submission are not retained at approval time. You will find these fields
>to be blank when you approve the book. If you do not feel like concoting
>new synopsis, try to get in touch with the submitter to obtain the
>original ones. I have already alerted Gustavo of the problem. This is
>actually a regression problem, which has been appearing and disappearing
>over the last couple of years.
>
>Oh yes, and remember to reassign book categories at approval time, those
>are lost as well.
>
>Finally, just in case, on the approval screen, please make sure that
>the quality rating assigned by the system matches the error rate. There
>is a chance that that one may be experiencing problems as well.
>
>Guido
Other related posts:
