[bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
- From: Madeleine Linares <Madeleinel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:12:58 +0000
Hi Fatima,
I'm sure they will take that into consideration but I have no idea whether or
not that process would or could be automated or not.
Best,
Madeleine
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fatima Alsofayyan
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:47 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
I wonder, would re-sorting the books in the existing categories be a problem?
-----Original Message-----
From: Madeleine Linares <Madeleinel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Dec 29, 2014 12:22 pm
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
Hey Kim, It’s something that our engineering team needs to change, yes.
I know that the collection development team (these are the people who get the
books into the collection) have been working on a more comprehensive set of
categories but I haven’t heard the most recent list. It’s always going to be a
bit of a struggle to make everyone happy, but we certainly know that some of
our existing ones don’t really make sense. I don’t think we’re at the point
where we need consultants but I will definitely remind the collection
development team that you all are our here and willing to help! Thanks for the
reminder! Best, Madeleine From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kim Friedman
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:09 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
Hi Madeleine, how much does it cost to change categories over by adding or
subtracting them? Is it an engineering problem? I’d tend to agree that fantasy
ought not to be lumped in which science fiction, but as for other stuff, I
suppose there are folks who will be more than happy in the subject of
nitpickery and will come up with all sorts of categories. I can think of
something myself. You have a category called cooking, food, and wine. I’d like
to see a category devoted for diets and nutrition as this is where you’d put
the diet plans, all sorts of research on nutrition. As for the cooking, food
and wine category, I think that’s where you’d put books on how to choose wines,
liquors, and various liqueurs, etc. and cookbooks with recipes, or books on the
history of a cuisine (although one can really get nitpicky in the history
category and have a spot for food history). As for fiction with recipes, I’d
generally prefer them in the fiction category, or mystery and thrillers (though
there again, when it comes to mysteries, you have police procedurals, P.I.
novels, historical mystery novels, thrillers, suspense, (ad infinitum). We,
your deranged perfectionist readers, will be very happy to act as consultants
for category nomenclature so you can just shake your head and wonder if you’ve
created a monster. Regards, Kim Friedman.
From:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Madeleine Linares
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:48 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
Hi all, We feel your pain! The collection development staff and myself are
definitely in agreement that we need more categories and better ones. We’ve
been pushing for this to happen, but since we have limited resources it has not
yet happened. I wish I could promise you that it would be fixed soon, but I
can’t. I can promise that we know about it and have raised the issue several
times. Sorry I don’t have any better information about this right now. If I
learn of any progress on this I’ll let you all know. Best, Madeleine
From:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Roger Loran Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 12:20 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
A long time ago we got a note from someone at Bookshare on list that the
science fiction and fantasy categories would be split. I don't remember who
that was, possibly the Bookshare librarian. However, it was a long time ago and
there has been no sign of that category being split.
Now, as long as I am on that topic let me go into one of my favorite rants when
it comes to literary discussion, that is, the difference between science
fiction and fantasy.
Let me first explain what science fiction and fantasy have in common.
They are both speculative fiction. As speculative fiction each story implicitly
asks the question, what if? The word if is then followed by a fantastic
supposition and the story itself is at least one answer to the question, By
fantastic supposition I mean an event, a being or some kind of scenario that is
outside the experience of anyone who has ever lived. That is, it just has not
ever happened, at least not yet.
Now the difference. The word science is not in science fiction for nothing.
Science is the study of reality. That means that in science fiction the
fantastic supposition is assumed within the context of the story to be a
manifestation of reality. When Hugo Gernsback invented the genre he invented it
as a gimmick. His actual purpose was to promote science and specifically, as he
put it, electrical invention.
That was in 1928 and true to his vision most of the science fiction he started
publishing was very gadget oriented. He thought that entertaining stories was a
good way to get people interested in science and gadgets. Science fiction has
come a long way since then, but it still makes the assumption that within the
context of the story the fantastic supposition is a manifestation of reality
even if it is extremely unlikely or even utterly impossible.
Fantasy has been around a lot longer than science fiction. In fact, it predates
science fiction by thousands of years. In fantasy the fantastic supposition is
assumed within the context of the story to be a manifestation of the
supernatural. That is, it is magic or some other kind of hocus pocus. As I
understand it the two genres started to be lumped together just after the
American publication of Lord of the Rings. Ballantine published that and it was
a hit. That led Ballantine to consider starting an adult fantasy imprint and
they did. However, it was a risk. Just because Lord of the Rings was so popular
there was no guarantee that other fantasy for adults would be popular and so
there was some reticence about how much to invest in the new adult fantasy
imprint. Well, they already had a science fiction imprint and the editor was
one Lin Carter. Lin Carter was given the additional job of fantasy editor. Then
there was the problem of where to get the fantasy.
Even though fantasy had been around thousands of years before science fiction
was even invented fantasy for adults was very rare in the United States. There
was plenty of it for children, but not much for adults. Since Lin Carter had a
working relationship with so many science fiction writers he started recruiting
science fiction writers to write the stuff. That explains why science fiction
writers are also fantasy writers so frequently. And then the fantasy started
being lumped together with the science fiction. Obviously Balantine's gamble
was successful because if you go into a bookstore nowadays you will see that a
lot more shelf space is taken up with fantasy than science fiction, but they
are still very unfortunately still being lumped together.
The difference is profound though. Again, the difference is that within the
context of the story the fantastic supposition is assumed to be a
manifestation of the supernatural in fantasy and it is assumed to be a
manifestation of reality in science fiction. Any two or more genres of fiction
can overlap and that includes science fiction and fantasy, but the genres are
still distinct enough from one another that most anyone can tell which is being
read while reading them. As long as there is a distinction between genres,
though, science fiction and fantasy have to be about as far apart as any two
genres of fiction can be. Again, it is the difference between reality and the
supernatural; it is the difference between chemistry and alchemy; it is the
difference between astronomy and astrology. I would dearly love to see this
lumping of them together stopped.
Genre fiction itself came about in the late nineteenth century with the pulp
magazines. Some magazines published detective stories. Other magazines
published westerns and so forth. Each magazine had certain requirements for its
authors and each author knew which magazines to submit a story to without being
summarily rejected and, knowing what kind of story each magazine published, the
reader would know which magazine to buy to get the kind of story that he or she
wanted. Then in
1928 science fiction was added as an additional genre. The usefulness of genre
to the reader has led to the concept of genre being retained and even some new
genres being added since the pulps disappeared, but the concept is still
useful. If you like to read a certain kind of story then it is well to know
what genre it will be in before reading it. Before the advent of the pulps
fiction was not divided into genres even if some stories have been
retrospectively classified into certain genres like the writings of H.G. Wells
and Jules Verne have been classified as science fiction even if they were not
considered to be genre fiction at the time of their publication. If we were to
go back to that time of unclassified fiction then I suppose it wouldn't matter,
but as long as it does matter what genre a story is in then it matters that
fantasy and science fiction not be lumped together. By lumping them together
the usefulness of genre is degraded. I prefer science fiction and so it is
annoying to me that when I browse a list of books of science fiction I keep
finding fantasy mixed in with it and I would suppose that the person who
prefers fantasy would feel the same way about science fiction being mixed in
with their fantasy. Then worse, there is always the possibility of picking up a
book that was listed under science fiction and while reading it finding out
that it is fantasy. At least I like fantasy too even if I prefer science
fiction, but the lumping of them together still gets in the way of selecting
the book one wants to read.On 12/24/2014 10:44 AM, Kim Friedman wrote:
Hi, I don’t see Bookshare changing its categories list any time soon do you?
Regards, Kim Friedman. From:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sue Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 4:52 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fairy tales versus Fantasy
Hi Judy,
Yes, I would consider it as fantasy, but the problem on Bookshare is that they
class fantasy with science fiction, and I wouldn’t consider fairy tales science
fiction. So I would probably leave that classification off. Bookshare needs to
update and expand the categories.
Sue S.
From:Judy s.
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 8:27 PM To:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Fairy tales versus Fantasy
Any thoughts about how to classify a book as to type if it is a child's fairy
tale? It's obviously a children's book, and it's literature and fiction, but
would you consider a fairy tale, like Little Red Riding Hood, a fantasy novel
as well?-- Judy s.
Follow me on Twitter at QuackersNCheese
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧu��jy��������%v+ ��+z�����y�b��(�
n��^ݺ{.n�+����+lzW���^���y�e�w���jX���ڽ��i�^r��jwl��m��(��^����� ��������r�b�
Other related posts:
