[bksvol-discuss] Re: Are volunteers really that important anymore?
- From: "Lori Castner" <loralee.castner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:34:50 -0700
Hi, Denise,
I have been volunteering for around two years, and I agree with all you have
said here and have said so well.
Lori C.
----- Original Message -----
From: Denise Thompson
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 8:41 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Are volunteers really that important anymore?
I have also had similar thoughts to yours Roger. I've only been a volunteer
for a few months and really get a kick out of a book I've scanned making its
way into the library. It does seem though its becoming harder and harder as we
go along. We now have so many places to check to see if a book we want to scan
is being done its getting overwhelming.
I'm only scanning books I want to read anyway- those that are missing from a
series or those by a particular author that aren't available. That way if
something happens and it gets into the collection without me I don't feel quite
so frustrated.
Because of the higher standards now set by Bookshare, it is harder to scan
and proof books which can be clearly seen in the discussions lately. I think
especially for those of us who are totally blind, the time it can take to make
sure it meets those standards is very great. Right now I'm struggling to rescan
a book that I previously scanned- Vanished. It was a great scan- pretty much
perfect it you are blind and just listening to it. However, it was early on in
my attempts and the whole line breaks and paragraph thing reared its ugly head
so I didn't even submit it. I'm rescanning it, but it's coming along very
slowly. Maybe because I've already read the book so my interest isn't as great.
I guess my point is the same as another volunteer made. In the early days I
could have submitted the book and folks would have been happy to have it as
part of the collection. Back in the days when volunteers were the main source
for sharing books. Now the process is over shadowed by fonts sizes, appropriate
breaks, blank lines at the top of the page and after the chapter name or
number... on and on. It's too bad really, but then again with bookshare buying
100 books three times a week the numbers of books available for us to read
increases the numbers of books much faster than all of us combined. I guess as
with everything else in life, there's a positive and negative side to progress.
Denise
At 07:22 PM 8/26/2009, you wrote:
I am not taking a position one way or another. I just thought I would
express some thoughts and questions that have been running through my mind. I
have been involved with Bookshare for just a little over a year now and have
seen some considerable changes. I have also surmised changes that came about
before I came along. As I understand it the name Bookshare was literal in the
beginning. That is, people posted the books they had scanned for themselves and
actually shared them with others who were posting books they had scanned for
themselves. That would have meant that the only source of books Bookshare had
for the most part was from the volunteers. Since then, though, publishers have
come to contribute large numbers of books. Bookshare is acquiring books from
donations or from buying them and scanning them in house or outsourcing them.
It actually appears that the number of books added to the collection by means
other than volunteers is considerably greater than those added by the
volunteers. I have noticed other things being done that volunteers do that may
be being done more prolifically by other means than by volunteers. On more than
one occasion now I have made a quality report for a book that contained an
error or errors. To my surprise the whole entire book was promptly replaced by
an outsourcer. That makes me wonder why we should bother with scanning a BSO.
Volunteers are more and more frequently finding that the books they intend to
scan are being added by outsourcers before the volunteer get a chance to add
it. Yes, that means that the volunteer can work on something else, but it still
remains that work that would have been done by a volunteer is being done
otherwise. We were asked for some suggestions about gaps in the collection and
I made a suggestion. As I scan the new books lists I see that it appears, to my
gratification, that my suggestions are being acted on. I am pleased, but I
cannot help noticing that it is being done without volunteers. If time is money
I wonder if it might be more efficient to donate money to Bookshare to buy
books and pay outsourcers rather than donate our time. If we want certain books
in the collection I wonder if it might be faster and more efficient to just
donate the books rather than put so much of our own labor into them. As things
change devices to accomplish our goals become obsolete when they are replaced
by better devices and certain jobs become obsolete when better and mor
efficient ways are found to do things. I wonder if Bookshare volunteering is a
job that is becoming obsolete. Since we have not even heard hints from
Bookshare that new volunteers are no longer welcome or that volunteers can give
up on certain jobs I wonder if Bookshare volunteering is becoming obsolete and
the folks at Bookshare do not even realize it yet. It does seem that the
volunteers are becoming less important to Bookshare and that Bookshare could
probably now do quite well without volunteers while still adding books at a
rapid rate. I am not saying that is good or bad. I am not saying that I want it
to be like that or that I don't want it to be like that. I am just wondering
and thinking. What do you guys think about what I have said?
"Can a nation be
free if it oppresses other nations? It cannot." Vladimir Lenin
The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder Press:
http://www.pathfinderpress.com
Granma International: http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html
_
Other related posts:
