Bruce Hartford <bruceh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: >FSM #1: Offshoring is being hyped by special interest groups. A poor >economy, not offshoring, is causing the loss of jobs. You mean the opposition to offshoring, not offshoring, right? Oh yes! Sorry ... Al wrote that one, and I edited it without rereading the it. I should know better! > FSM#0 Offshoring is good for everyone because it lowers the prices we > pay for goods and services. It increases our standard of living > because the things we buy are cheaper, and it lowers taxes because > government work can be done at lower cost. I had been thinking of incorporating this into FSM #2 or #5. I hadn't considered material goods at all, and that adds another dimension to the jobs argument -- manufacturing/garment industry job losses. I was focusing my research on techie jobs, because I assumed most BizTech writers would relate to them specifically. I did forget to mention in the intro that the audience for this piece has been designated as NWU members and potential members. >.. the government should not allow offshoring of government > services or work done by private firms under government contract. To > oppose offshoring of government we we have to confront the "cheaper > is better" notion. I don't know .. I've considered some arguments that we'd be better off offshoring the U.S. Congress and some parts of the Executive Branch <snerk>. Margherite