On 2008-05-13 at 10:47:58 [+0200], Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx> wrote: > Am 13.05.2008 um 10:39 schrieb Brecht Machiels: > > > On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 17:51 +0200, Ingo Weinhold wrote: > >> This method is OK, if there are no more than one or two directories > >> where to > >> install stuff, but it will be more than that for most ports. I'm > >> undecided > >> what method is the best: .pkg, Haiku-style packages, or LibPak > >> packages. > > > > Has anything been decided yet with respect to Haiku installer > > packages? Nothing that I know of at least. I haven't followed the discussion really, though. > > I recall that a new format was going to be developed to replace the > > SoftwareValet installer package format. It would consist of an archive > > (zip for example) which holds both the files and a recipe for > > installing > > them. > > For now Haiku's Optional Package format (zip archive with absolute > paths plus description file) would be most convenient, i.e. would > allow to pre-populate our Haiku images with it. For Haiku that's definitely OK ATM, but there's definitely a more wholistic packaging/installing scheme needed in the future. CU, Ingo -- BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts List archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/beports Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx