[AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 133/146/K14
- From: "Ken Reeves" <kreeves@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:09:20 -0700
AJ and Brian,
Thanks for the info. I realize that they are catalogued with three
differententries, but I was more wondering about the physical connection.
I'll try to do a little of the research on the sites mentioned.
Ken
AJ Crayon wrote: Ken, according to the NGC/IC Project that contains
Herschel's notes, NGC133
and NGC146 are the results of two different observations. This being the
case, then King 14 is another, third, observation. Hence, I'd say they are
three separate clusters.
Now the interesting question . . . are these three one physical cluster or
are
they related in some physical way? I would have to spend some time
searching
SIMBAD and VIZIER to see if there are any papers on this topic. I will, as
time permits, but if someone beats me to it that would be okay because I'm
not
sure how long this would take me. Primarily because of experience searching
these sites and the time constraint.
Clear skies,
aj
Ken Reeves wrote:
> One of the objects I observed last night was the NGC 133, NGC146, K14
> complex. Although there are three catalog designations, I always wondered
> with this group (and many other open cluster groups) if they are really 3
> separate clusters or if they are one physical cluster with 3 areas of
> concentration. To me it looks like one cluster with 3 concentrations.
> Others opinions/comments?
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
