atw: Re: techwriter creed

From: "Christine Kent" <cmkentau@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:47:04 +1100

Just to raise the tone of the debate - I think attachments come through.  If
not, you just missed the joke.

I love the file name, too.

Attachment: 319862_413651925317379_154356697913571_1806276_143042503_n.jpg
Description: JPEG image

Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: techwriter creed
  - From: Bill Parker

References:
- atw: Change of collective noun use - why?
  - From: Lee O'Mahoney
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use - why?
  - From: Bob Trussler
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use - why?
  - From: Michael Lewis
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use - why?
  - From: Geoffrey
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because
  - From: Michelle Hallett
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because
  - From: Michael Lewis
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Peter . Martin
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Michael Lewis
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Michelle Hallett
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Howard Silcock
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Ros Byrne
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Howard Silcock
- atw: Re: Change of collective noun use and other changes - why? Just because [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  - From: Ros Byrne
- atw: techwriter creed
  - From: Terry Dowling
- atw: Re: techwriter creed
  - From: Michael Lewis

atw: Re: techwriter creed

Other related posts: