Re: [artworks] Upgrade path
- From: Richard Ashbery <riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:42:40 +0100
In article <58cc1f8852.signwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nick K
<signwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <5287f4ede1riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Ashbery
> <riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > You can be sure that AW users influence what Martin adds to the
> > package and I suspect implementation depends how high up the
> > feature list it is.
> How does that list work ? does the few who ask often get what they
> want? or is there a small straw poll and the easiest implemented?
> Would it not be fair if you buy the upgrade you then get a vote for
> next implementation . Then the features with the most votes gets
> implemented in the next release. providing of course it is
> reasonably viable.
An interesting idea and something I hadn't considered - I've no doubt
Martin will answer.
> I have upgraded in the past just to keep Artworks going in the hope
> of something new I would find useful, despite not having a use for
> any of the new tools in that release and have not used to this day
Isn't that the case for all users?
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------
To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to
//www.freelists.org/list/artworks
------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
