Matt:
It seems to me possible that there is a market in below Mach 1 HPR users,
although I fail to parse why a slightly longer launch tower would not
suffice at much lower cost.
I’m interested, do keep me informed.
Bill
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 5:16 PM Matthew JL <prmattjl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill,
Our first test flight is supposed to be August 7/8 at METRA (upstate NY/NJ
TRA). Fingers crossed on it going well. I think we’ll have a strong
product in 6-8 months.
The real challenge among other things is getting around control reversal
at high Mach, as you point out. For high speed flights we’ll have to
include some modifications. Got a few thoughts on how to do that, but TBD
- we’re hitting M0.55 on this first test.
Best,
-Matt L.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 6:48 PM William Claybaugh <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Matt:
I’m a buyer; if have something that is ready—or near ready—to test I am
interested.
I’m working in 6” (upper stage) diameter and I am looking at Mach 3 near
term…which means canards have to handle shocks and shock interactions with
the fins. Forgive me if I am a little skeptical about any generic solution
to supersonic control: too much depends on the exact mass properties of the
hardware. But I am a buyer, if you have a product….
Bill
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:36 PM Matthew JL <prmattjl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill,
By “we” I mean myself and my team, we’re descended from a collegiate
rocketry team. (Follow us on Instagram!
https://www.instagram.com/aper_space/). Currently the baseline is an
aerodynamic stabilizer in a 4” airframe, but we plan on upgrading that to
6” and other methods.
Ideally it’s a turnkey system that slots into a compatible body tube
(sized for couplers). Drop it in, turn it on, fly straight.
Best,
-Matt L.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 6:17 PM William Claybaugh <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Matt:
Who’s “we”?
Should I anticipate this tool to make use of aerodynamic or reaction
controls? What diameter and mass vehicle(s) to you expect to be able to
handle?
Bill
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:33 PM Matthew JL <prmattjl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill,
We’re working on something to that end.
Best,
-Matt L.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:31 PM William Claybaugh <
wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anthony:
GNC for flying straight up is of interest to me; a proven turnkey
capability would be a big asset in working with FAA on high altitude
flights.
Bill
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:04 PM Anthony Cesaroni <
anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Like NAR, no GNC allowed?
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x1004 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
EXPORT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT: This document may contain information
whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22,
U.S.C., Sec 2751 Et Seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979, as
amended, (Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401, Et. Seq.) Violations to these
export
laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.
This technical data obtained from Cesaroni Technology Incorporated
or Cesaroni Aerospace either electronically or in any other media form
is
subject to U.S. Export Control Laws including the International Traffic
in
Arms Regulations (ITAR). Such technical data is not to be placed in the
public domain, may not be disclosed to foreign persons or otherwise
exported without first obtaining required US Government export
authorization and written authorization from Cesaroni Technology
Incorporated.
*From:* arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *On
Behalf Of *roxanna Mason
*Sent:* Monday, July 26, 2021 12:54 PM
*To:* arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [AR] Re: V1 Flying instructional video
But this isn't 'amature rockets', you know, some people get mad.
K
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anthony Cesaroni <
anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The GNC description is interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EEZuXQyA-E
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x1004 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
