Re: [ARMini-support] Omni versus sunfish
- From: "Malcolm A. Hussain-Gambles" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "malcolm" for DMARC)
- To: armini-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:34:26 +0100 (BST)
Not of direct help, but I scrapped Omni and moved to lanman98.
I've not had any problems yet, really happy with it.
Cheers,
Malcolm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Lesurf" <jcgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: armini-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 8 April, 2016 17:45:30
Subject: Re: [ARMini-support] Omni versus sunfish
In article <454aaa6d55.Alan.Adams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Adams
<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The filenames are all ones that use the standard alphabet and set of
numbers, plus using an underscore as a 'space'. I use the same
filename / directory naming format for all my audio recordings. So
something like:
LP_Brahms_PianoConcertos_Barenboim_Barbirolli_EMI_SLS874
for a directory and something like
Brahms_1stPianoCon_Side1.flac
for a file.
It's not something like the number of characters in the full file path
- likely to be limited to somewhere near 255 for Omni?
No. The examples I've been quoting, etc, are all in the same directory. In
that I find that, for example. a subdirectory "A_Beethoven" is absent, but
some other subdirectories with names more than 4 times as long as that are
shown. I can't see any obvious pattern.
However as I've said, I've given up on Omni as not been useable, and just
use Sunfish and FTPc instead.
Jim
--
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
Audio Misc
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
Armstrong Audio
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit
//www.freelists.org/list/armini-support
List-related queries to info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit
//www.freelists.org/list/armini-support
List-related queries to info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
