Hello Graeme On 9-Feb-2011, Graeme Gill wrote: > > Yes, this was an attempt to deal with the sorts of problems we have been > discussing. > It has not been part of the compiled code for some years though, and would > take some > effort to re-merge. There have been a number of changes that would require > significant work. I understood... so it's maybe more likely that you instead finish first the so called optimized separation code rather than re-merging xlutfix... Btw, I also noticed you already implemented the -G option to xicclu, rewrote a new averaging-merging program and many other fixes. Thanks for that :) Looking forward for the complete 1.3.3 release. /&