[argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table

  • From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <profiling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:00:37 +0100

Hi,

Graeme Gill wrote:

It would only start to make sense if the gamut wasn't represented
as a surface, but as a 3 dimensional density mapping, and a rather
different gamut mapping algorithm was then used, or some sort
of thresholding was used to establish a gamut surface.

OK - thanks for confirming - I thought that was the case, I just wanted to check there wasn't something else going on behind the scenes. You have me wondering now about thresholding as a means of ignoring outliers due to noise. Something to ponder. :)

I've tentatively renamed "profile" to "aglprof", and
"icclink" to "agllink", but I'm not terribly happy with either of them :-(

Just thinking aloud here - so ignore at will, but how about...

iccprof
mkiccprof
devlink
mkdevlink
mkicclink

All the best,
--
Alastair M. Robinson

Other related posts: