Yes, that is true. My ccmx matrix and the matrix from the list for "Spyder3 + HP LP2475w" combination are different. Completely different. P.S. BTW my Spyder3 works fine in Quato iColor Display when setting "Wide Gamut S-IPS (generic)" colorimeter correction option. (I compared it with i1Pro.) Best regards, Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:40:19 +0000 (UTC) darzur wrote: > Hello guys, > I don't think that ccmx created for a particular monitor/calibrator > combination will be useful for any another combo. It's mainly because very > poor inter-instrumental agreement between cheap colorimeters. Spyder 3 or > i1D are proven to have up to 18dE between instruments. If you add variations > between monitors to this equation then it's clearly visible that matrix > created by me will be most probably useless to any of you. Additionally > using such matrix you will never be sure whether everything is OK or not as > you don't have any reference. > But despite of this ccmxmake is a very powerful tool and it was main reason > I've decided to ArgyllCMS. Considering that spectroradiometers are very > expensive in comparison with colorimeters and have poor response in dark > areas I've decided to buy cheapest Spyder 3 and rent some spectroradiometer > (ColorMunki most probably) for a day or two. Then I'll create correction > matrices for my two monitors/TV/Spyder3 combo. I think that then everything > should be fine, but my matrix will be ONLY valid for my Spyder 3 and when > used with another Spyder will give random unpredictable results. > Unfortunately I didn't do it yet, mainly due to lack of free time. :) > P.S. It's my first attempt to use mailing lists so maybe you can give little > help to me. Is it possible to download this month's list archive to my email > client (The Bat!)? > br, > darzur