[argyllcms] Re: WP correction with ICC based CMS applications.
- From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:36:30 -0400
Janos,
Absolute Colorimetric intent is *always* your friend ;-)
/ Roger
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of János, Tóth F.
Sent: 23 octobre 2010 20:11
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: WP correction with ICC based CMS applications.
I don't know what was the problem but I created a new profile from the same
ti3 file and now it works like charm.
New white rectangle in paint, rendered without CMS -> ~5900K
Paint saved white rectangle in Photoshop, Relative colorimetric rendering ->
~6500K
New white rectangle in photoshop, Relative colorimetric rendering -> ~6500K
Photoshop saved white rectangle, rendered without CMS -> ~5900K
Photoshop saved and converted white rectangle, rendered without CMS ->
~6500K
Photoshop saved and converted white rectangle, Relative colorimetric
rendering-> ~6500K
If the Relative colorimetric intent is not my fiend then there is a problem
now. :)
Could it be a problem that I chose the Ultra quality mode for colorprof? (I
created a Low quality profile this time for a quick test.)
Could there be a limitation that some softwares can't work with ICC files
which has big file sizes and/or big LUT size?
But before somebody would open the champaign for me...
The gray gradient is a complete mess with this small cLUT profile. And
absolute colorimetric is still broken in MPC-HC (it is worse than the
current, small LUT based Relative colorimetric).
Other related posts:
