[argyllcms] Re: Spectrolino Spectroscan charrtread problem
- From: Magnus Wallden <magnus.wallden@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:48:34 +0200
Hi !
I´m not sure, but I think 1.33 didnt work.
I use 1.68 Spectrolino
2.11 Spectroscan
Try to find 1.68 or higher and update.
I did a quick test whit 1.33, and of course, it worked, I dont think
it is a Argyll problem.
-----------
I have no idea about the reading diff, but I think, depending on the media
surface, Spectrolino
whit Pol-filter will give a darker reading on dark areas, the Pol seems to
ignore (more or less) the mate surface
light spread.
//Magnus
2011/5/17 Vittorio Villani <vittoriovillani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks for the answer.
>
> I changed the -F parameter trying all the possibilities. I also noticed
> that with the P filter I can use -f U (no filter) and it works. With UV and
> D65 filter it will not work at all, I tried first the correct parameter (u
> and 6) than I tried with the others but nothing changed.
>
> My SpectroScan has SW Version 2.11; the Spectrolino is 1.33. I tried the
> X-Rite Download Utilty in crash mode but it says "the software is already
> udated". I tried to use the crash mode with only the Spectrolino and then
> with both Spectrolino and SpectroScan connected but I obtained the same
> result.
>
> I made a profile from the measurements taken with the Pol and I saw it in
> ColorThink. The profile is similar to the profile that I made with the i1Pro
> but it seems to be "all darker". For example the black point in the i1Pro
> profile is 3.6 in the Spectrolino 1.8 (L* value). Looking the shape of both
> profiles it seems that the Spectrolino profile has a larger gamut but it is
> moved all "down" to the dark tones...
>
>
> Do you have any other suggestion?
>
>
> Do you think that it could be helpful to send the Spectrolino to X-Rite to
> have it re-certificated?
>
>
> Vittorio
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:05:48 +0200
> Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Spectrolino Spectroscan charrtread problem
> From: magnus.wallden@xxxxxxxxx
> To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Hi !
>
> I suppose You changed the -F <parameter> to the for the filter valid ?
>
>
>
> If You do so, I hade something like this whit my Spsc, the solution was to
> update the
> Spectrolino, download program and software update file for this from
> x-rite.
>
> It was a little bit nervous, there was two way to download the software to
> spectrolino,
> "update" and the outher way: "panic" or "crash" or some similar. ( I dont
> remember )
>
> Of course only the crash way worked.
>
>
> There is also update for the Spectroscan, but for this i think the "update"
> worked, if I remember correct.
>
>
> After this it worked whit all filters.
>
> -----------
>
> I think You can use the pol as standard, I often use this on matt and on
> fineart paper, it removes or
> decremnts the "hairy" surface on mate papers, If the result value is the
> true, I dont know, but it gives
> in the most case better end result.
>
> //Magnus
>
>
>
>
>
> 2011/5/16 Vittorio Villani <vittoriovillani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi all.
>
>
> I have received a Spectrolino with Spectroscan and I am making some tests.
>
>
> I am using:
>
>
> printtarg -v -iSS -h -t360 -pA4 name
>
> chartread -v -F p name
>
>
> The problem that I have is this:
>
>
> If I use the polarizing filter everything works fine and I can get a nice
> profile.
>
>
> If I try to use the UV or the D65 filter I always get this error after a
> few reads:
>
>
> Got 'Wrong Configuration' (No valid character) error.
>
> Hit Esc or 'q' to give up, any other key to retry:
>
>
> Do you have any suggestions?
>
>
> I don’t have the “no filter”, I have only the UV, the D65 and the
> polarizing filter.
> I tried to clean the filter and the Spectrolino with a blower and a soft
> cloth without any result.
> I always got the same error.
>
>
> Thanks.
> Vittorio Villani
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
--
Magnus Wallden
Klockarevägen 29
331 52 Värnamo
+46 (0) 370 10478
+46 (0)703 33 45 19
magnus.wallden@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
