[argyllcms] Re: Printer profiling: Canon Pixma iP4850 CYMK
- From: "Alan Goldhammer" <agoldhammer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:49:20 -0400
Epson profiles are generally quite good but I don't use many Epson papers
with my 3880. The one Ilford paper I like, Gold Fiber Silk has terrible
profiles on their website. Museo's are generally OK but I do better with my
own Argyll profiles. Canson likewise.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of edmund ronald
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 7:21 PM
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Printer profiling: Canon Pixma iP4850 CYMK
On Epson Glossy Premium Pro, my Epson 3880 is almost identical in results
with Vendor Color mode and in profiled mode, with my own profiles generated
by the latest i1Profiler and iSis with 800 patches.
Does this mean that I am double profiling, or is Epson now using
i1Profiler2 to generate their own profiles? My impression is that the
printer manufacturers have a really good grip on sample variation now.
Edmund
Other related posts:
