[argyllcms] Re: [Possible bug] Calibration during dispcal measurements
- From: Ilya Dedinsky <ded@xxxxxxxx>
- To: Graeme Gill <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:19:53 +0400
Hi Graeme,
Here's the command line I used to profile when the bug occurred:
dispcal -v -H -yc -qh -gs -t6500 -e1 -o "_%name% 6500K sRGB (A) %date%"
When I changed profile quality to -qm (default), the calibration processed
smoothly without this issue. So I found a workaround and can patiently wait
for the new release. :)
I consider Argyll to be the best calibration software I used (X-Rite/Gretag
i1 Profiler, PM, Monaco, ... many in-RIP calibrators). The precision and control
are excellent, CLI is flexible and easy to reproduce / invoke from scripts.
Thank you!
Regards,
Ilya Dedinsky
ded
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Press RESET to continue...
----- Original Message -----
From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 10 февраля 2014 г., 07:47:48
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: [Possible bug] Calibration during dispcal measurements
GG> Ilya Dedinsky wrote:
GG> Hi,
GG> thanks for your report.
>> During calibration process (iteration 4) dispcal asked me to re-calibrate
>> instrument.
>> Here is dispcal message:
GG> Hmm. There are a couple of bugs here. One is that (currentl) Argyll
shouldn't
GG> ask for instrument calibration during display calibration or profiling.
GG> The other (as you note) is that it doesn't give you a chance to position
GG> the instrument back on the display afterwards.
>> Is this behavior is normal, or may be better to pause dispcal until correct
>> re-positioning
>> of the instrument on the screen?
GG> This will be fixed in the next release. Let me know if you need a fix
sooner than
GG> that.
GG> Graeme Gill.
Other related posts:
