Tomazh, you're right. So, precisely measure your Colormunki width in mm (calipers will help), and you get CMW. Then calculate needed row width: RW=CMW/5. Then calculate needed scale factor for printtarg: A=RW/8 And finally use this factor in printtarg: -a A 2014-02-01 Tomasz Danus <t.danus@xxxxxxxxx>: > Ivan > > Unfortunately not every CM is 41.3mm wide. > Mine is 42.0 - 2,5 years old purchased in UK > and it was discussed here that various CM has different width. > So your advice is perfectly fine if you replace 41.3 by X > and every one can make their own calculation based on > their own particular CM unit > > Cheers > Tom > > -- > t.danus@xxxxxxxxx > Skype: Ithilstone > > > On 31 January 2014 11:03, Ivan Tsyba <ivantsyba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Default i1 8 mm patch size is not good for ColorMunki. >> Use 8.26 mm row width: ColoMunki width is 41.3 mm, 41.3 / 5 = 8.26, so >> you can read target with ruler >> >> Just add to printarg "-a 1.0325" that scale i1 row to 8.26 mm >> (8*1.0325=8.26). >> >> >> 2014-01-31 Todd Sailor <mfdisme@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> That seemed to have worked. I did tweak the -p value to 330x482. >>> >>> It took a bit with Adobe Color Printer Utility, but scaling at 97% got >>> it all on one page. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> On Jan 30, 2014, at 5:59 PM, BC Rider <bcrider99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >> However, I still need some help filling up an A3+ (13"x19") sheet >>> with patches. I have a ColorMunki and I understand 8mm is an acceptable >>> minimum size. I would like to fill a page or two with patches at this size. >>> >> >>> >> Could someone walk me through the targen string, or provide it? >>> >> >>> > >>> > What printtarg string are you using? The following will support 1748 >>> patches assuming I have the A3+ size correct: >>> > >>> > printtarg -v -iCM -h -a0.6 -t360 -p333x482 testname >>> > >>> > Given that, targen just needs to produce a 1748 patch target: >>> > >>> > targen -v -d2 -G -f1748 testname >>> > >>> > Be sure to measure your printed target to check for unexpected scaling >>> problems. Suggest scanning with a double-sided ruler (search archives for >>> discussion of this) with 8.22mm patch size (measure 10 rows and divide by >>> 10). >>> >>> >>> >> >