Jason J. Campbell wrote: > Thank you for this explanation. I guess the only remaining question for > the benefit of my understanding is "what is more accurate" in terms of > Argyll -- the B2A lookup (standard CMM method from PCS->Device) or this > "Inverse A2B" lookup? Hi, The inverse A2B (for in-gamut colors using xicclu -fif) is precice within some floating point rounding error. You can easily check this by looking up the value in the A2B. Graeme Gill.