[argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.5.0 has been released

  • From: Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:36:07 -0700

On Mar 4, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ben Goren wrote:
> 
>> Any chance you've got a better idea of what the new i1 is like, and how much 
>> of an
>> upgrade it is over the old one?
> 
> Hi,
>       I've not got much to add at the moment. It's hard to evaluate with 
> nothing
> of a known higher accuracy to compare it with. The better black calibration 
> helps
> in making low level display measurements a lot. The UV LED does seem to have 
> the
> potential to improve FWA compensation by something like 1 DE, or perhaps more 
> with
> unusual paper. The wavelength calibration is doing little at the moment,
> but I'm not about to bash the instrument about in an attempt to cause some
> optical mis-alignment for it to correct!
> 
> I have had some trouble with unreliability in making reflective measurements. 
> It
> seems like it might be a USB connection problem but being intermittent, I 
> haven't
> got to the bottom of whether it is related to the i1pro2 or not.

Thanks for the update. Seems like, for the time being, the situation remains 
the same: worth getting the new version if buying new, but for most not worth 
upgrading if you've already got the old.

Cheers,

b&

P.S. I hope to be doing my first real profiling with the new version later this 
week, and sometime next week at the absolute latest. I'll let you know what I 
find.... b&

Other related posts: