On Mar 4, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ben Goren wrote: > >> Any chance you've got a better idea of what the new i1 is like, and how much >> of an >> upgrade it is over the old one? > > Hi, > I've not got much to add at the moment. It's hard to evaluate with > nothing > of a known higher accuracy to compare it with. The better black calibration > helps > in making low level display measurements a lot. The UV LED does seem to have > the > potential to improve FWA compensation by something like 1 DE, or perhaps more > with > unusual paper. The wavelength calibration is doing little at the moment, > but I'm not about to bash the instrument about in an attempt to cause some > optical mis-alignment for it to correct! > > I have had some trouble with unreliability in making reflective measurements. > It > seems like it might be a USB connection problem but being intermittent, I > haven't > got to the bottom of whether it is related to the i1pro2 or not. Thanks for the update. Seems like, for the time being, the situation remains the same: worth getting the new version if buying new, but for most not worth upgrading if you've already got the old. Cheers, b& P.S. I hope to be doing my first real profiling with the new version later this week, and sometime next week at the absolute latest. I'll let you know what I find.... b&