[argyllcms] Re: Are these good SpectraView II Results (NEC3090 with ColorMunki)
- From: liu logo <oneninty2002@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dh003i@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:04:12 +0800 (CST)
Yes !
The result is pretty good for you monitor.
Following is the calibration of my monitor for your reference.
---- Information: Display 1 - LCD1990SX ----
--- White Point ---
Target: 6506 K
Target: ( 0.313 , 0.329 )
Calibrated: 6539 K
Calibrated: ( 0.312 , 0.329 ) (CIE x,y)>
Delta E: 0.41
--- Display Luminance ---
Target: Intensity 45.0 cd/m²
Calibrated: Intensity 44.7 cd/m²
Target: Black Level N/A
Calibrated: Black Level 0.13 cd/m²
Auto Luminance: N/A
--- Gamma Curve ---
Target: 2.20
Calibration Steps: 52
--- Primary Colors ---
Red: 0.629 , 0.328
Green: 0.281 , 0.594
Blue: 0.145 , 0.066
Calibration Sensor
--- Contrast Ratio ---
Target: Monitor Default
Calibrated: 341:1
--- Display Monitor ---
Model: LCD1990SX
Serial #: 04106287UA
Firmware: 1.00.26
Current Usage: 75.4 hours usage
Last Calibration: 69.9 hours usage ago
Calibration Date: 2011/1/4 下午 11:16
--- Calibration Sensor ---
Model: X-Rite EyeOne
Color Tracking:
===========
Excluding Dark Values:
Grayscale dE Average - 0.37
Grayscale dE Maximum - 0.60
Including Dark Values:
Grayscale dE Average - 0.56
Grayscale dE Maximum - 2.84
________________________________
寄件者： David Heinrich <dh003i@xxxxxxxxx>
收件者： argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
寄件日期： 2011/1/10 (一) 8:29:10 PM
主 旨： [argyllcms] Are these good SpectraView II Results (NEC3090 with ColorMunki)
As suggested by several on this mailing list, I bought a copy of
Spectrarview II and used it to auto-calibrate my NEC3090WQXi with the
ColorMunki. Here are my results, are these good?
Also, it says my "Current Usage" is 204.8 hours (8.53 days of total
on-time). It seems like I've been on it for more hours than that by
myself, and this is a refurbished monitor. Is this accurate?
Black Body:
=========
Target - 5001 K (0.0346, 0.0358)
Calibrated - 5036 K (0.0345 , 0.0358)
Delta E: 0.69
Contrast Ratio:
===========
Target - Monitor Default
Calibrated - 222:1
Display Luminance:
==============
Black Level:
Target - N/A
Calibrated - 0.036 cd/m^2
Intensity:
Target - 80.0 cd/m^2
Calibrated - 79.4 cd/m^2
Auto Luminance - On
Gamma Curve:
===========
Target - 1.80
Calibration Steps - 32
Color Tracking:
===========
Excluding Dark Values:
Grayscale dE Average - 0.97
Grayscale dE Maximum - 1.82
Including Dark Values:
Grayscale dE Average - 1.59
Grayscale dE Maximum - 5.78
So presuming these are good values, I should go ahead with Argyll CMS
and do a high-quality LUT-based profiling?
Other related posts:
