Vicky,
That works for me. My main point is that we don’t necessarily have to get
dragged back down into a long, drawn-out email exchange.
Regards,
Stan
From: aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria Mercieca
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 11:27 AM
To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Responding to MANET comments
Hi Stan,
OK, point by point would be silly, but the points I summarised (unless there
are any objections among the author team) might be things that the working
group could have an input on? At least we could acknowledge that these are
issues we will consider, that we are actively addressing?
Vicky.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Ratliff, Stanley
<sratliff@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sratliff@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Just one observation –
Thomas stated “…I’d much prefer if the authors engage here, on the list…”
Thomas’ preferences, *plus* 15 Euros, will get him a latte in the trendy,
up-scale, over-priced, coffee house of his choice. ☺
The point I’m driving at is – don’t take Thomas’ preference as “we MUST do it
this way”. Whatever works best for us is how we should proceed. And ultimately,
all of the email threads that Thomas *requests* will result in a draft, that
has to be reviewed and approved by the WG. So I guess I would ask - does going
to a point-by-point email discussion with Clausen seem like something that
reduces our time to posting a draft? Perhaps the answer is that it would on
some of the points raised, and it wouldn’t on others… I don’t know for sure,
but it’s at least worth a quick thought.
Regards,
Stan
This actually looks like a lot of unresolved points :( but they mostly overlap
with Thomas Clausen's comments which I guess we will go to the mailing list to
discuss...
In regards to Thomas' comments, I was drafting an email to respond and start
discussion on the recurring issues he highlighted. I should also go through our
most recent emails to identify anything outstanding. If you would like to
respond to Chris, I could respond to Thomas? My summary is included below in
case anyone wants to check it before I send?
_____________________________________________________
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________
