[aodvv2-discuss] Re: Draft 13f (did some proofreading)
- From: "Lotte Steenbrink" <lsteen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:28:25 +0100
Not sure, it depends how you read it! I would say "an arr-reck", I think
one of Thomas Clausen's previous comments was along the lines of
"arr-arr-eee-cue". In both cases, "an RREQ" is more appropriate I think.
If
you expand it as you read, and say "a route request" then "a RREQ" is
fine.
I'm not bothered but I tried to keep it consistent to Thomas Clausen's
past
comments.
True, that makes a lot of sense.. I'm sorry I troubled you with this :)
Regards,
Vicky.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Lotte Steenbrink
<lsteen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Hi Vicky,
one tiny thing: page 6, line 21: shouldn't it be "a RREQ" instead of "an
RREQ"?
Regards,
Lotte
Hi all,
I did some proofreading and changed a few words, moved a couple of
small
bits around, nothing major. Diff and draft attached.
Regards,
Vicky
Other related posts:
