[aodvv2-discuss] Re: Draft 13f (did some proofreading)

  • From: Victoria Mercieca <vmercieca0@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:07:14 +0000

Not sure, it depends how you read it! I would say "an arr-reck", I think
one of Thomas Clausen's previous comments was along the lines of
"arr-arr-eee-cue". In both cases, "an RREQ" is more appropriate I think. If
you expand it as you read, and say "a route request" then "a RREQ" is fine.
I'm not bothered but I tried to keep it consistent to Thomas Clausen's past
comments.

Regards,
Vicky.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Lotte Steenbrink <lsteen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

wrote:

Hi Vicky,
one tiny thing: page 6, line 21: shouldn't it be "a RREQ" instead of "an
RREQ"?

Regards,
Lotte

Hi all,

I did some proofreading and changed a few words, moved a couple of small
bits around, nothing major. Diff and draft attached.

Regards,
Vicky





Other related posts: