As to splitting the documents – at least with DLEP, that would cause
significant churn, and we’re resisting. For the same reason, I’m reluctant to
split AODVv2.
Regards,
Stan
From: aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria Mercieca
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:22 AM
To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Decision time, folks
Hi all,
On routes to neighbours, I think the quickest easiest option is to specify that
a route to the neighbour is installed in order to send the RREP by unicast (and
thus avoid the need for multicast, and avoid rewriting the RREP to include the
intended next hop and act as the acknowledgement too). Whether its right to
choose the "quickest easiest" option is debatable, but if this works for now,
and we still have the option to change this at a later date, I'd be happy to
take this option.
Where are we on the gateway topic? Did anyone have any thoughts about moving
the applicability and gateway stuff into a separate draft as Keyur suggested?
How much, if anything, would then be necessary in the main AODVv2 draft?
Regards,
Vicky.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:04 AM, John Dowdell
<john.dowdell486@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:john.dowdell486@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Good morning all
As you all know, draft submission cut off time is 2359 UTC on Monday 6 July (=
0059 July 7 in UK). Vicky is on holiday next week, and Lotte is fast
approaching (if not already in) exam time, which means we need to go firm on
two topics currently under discussion by the time Vicky starts work at 0900 UK
time tomorrow (so that's 0100 Friday for Charlie, 0400 Stan and 1000 Lotte) in
order for Vicky to make final substantive changes. Any remaining scraps can be
tidied up on the Monday 6th when Vicky returns from holiday and we can submit.
I believe Working Group Last Call does not mean we can't make any more changes.
You'll have seen (and some of you have lived) the changes to DLEP as it went
through and following the last call period. We still haven't had a great deal
of feedback from the working group which means they're either busy, don't have
an opinion, or are ok with it, but regardless we still need to plough on and
come to consensus for now. Details can still be worked on, and indeed I was
just discussing with Vicky the prospect of an author team call while most of us
are at Prague.
So the two topics are gateways and routes to neighbours.
I'm not going to direct the outcome, that wouldn't be fair, but I need you all
to come to a position of "good enough for now", to arrive at a document that we
can all defend at Prague, and that position needs to be arrived at by the time
mentioned above. This may mean each of you need to concede on certain points of
detail, perhaps against your better judgement, but it won't be the last time we
can change things.
I'm really pleased with the progress, we have come a long way. Let's work
together to get these last points agreed (for now) and written up.
Thanks and Best Regards
John
_____________________________________________________
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________
